Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oussama Draissi
dblp:331/4560
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-6065-8087ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Systems and software security · 78% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 22% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 82% Runtime systems and virtual machines · 18% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
memory safety |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Bento: Fine-Grained Memory Isolation for COTS WebAssembly Binaries · WWW 2026 |
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
smart contract security |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Software testing
fuzzing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Software testing › fuzzing
smart contract fuzzing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Runtime systems and virtual machines › language runtime
webassembly runtime |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Bento: Fine-Grained Memory Isolation for COTS WebAssembly Binaries · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fuzzing · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $2B Lessons: Brigade as a Defense Against Real-World DeFi Bridge Exploits
Pascal Winkler, Jens-Rene Giesen, Oussama Draissi, Federico Badaloni, Sebastian Holler, Clara Schneidewind, Lucas Davi |
ACNS (2) | 3 |
| 2026 | Bento: Fine-Grained Memory Isolation for COTS WebAssembly BinariesabstractWebAssembly (Wasm) enables execution of memory-unsafe languages like C/C++ in the browser, but its monolithic linear memory leaves modules vulnerable to high-impact attacks such as cross-site scripting. Existing defenses are unsuitable for commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) binaries, requiring either source code, non-standard runtimes, or introduce high-overhead instrumentation. Oussama Draissi, Lucas Davi |
WWW | 1 |
| 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart ContractsabstractSolana has quickly emerged as a popular platform for building decentralized applications (DApps), such as marketplaces for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). A key reason for its success are Solana's low transaction fees and high performance, which is achieved in part due to its stateless programming model. Although the literature features extensive tooling support for smart contract security, current solutions are largely tailored for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. Unfortunately, the very stateless nature of Solana's execution environment introduces novel attack patterns specific to Solana requiring a rethinking for building vulnerability analysis methods. Sven Smolka, Jens-Rene Giesen, Pascal Winkler, Oussama Draissi, Lucas Davi, Ghassan Karame, Klaus Pohl |
CCS | 4 |
| 2022 | RiscyROP: Automated Return-Oriented Programming Attacks on RISC-V and ARM64abstractReturn-oriented programming (ROP) is a powerful run-time exploitation technique to attack vulnerable software. Modern RISC architectures like RISC-V and ARM64 pose new challenges for ROP execution due to the lack of a stack-based return instruction and strict instruction alignment. Further, the large number of caller-saved argument registers significantly reduces the gadget space available to the attacker. Consequently, existing ROP gadget tools for other processor architectures cannot be applied to these RISC architectures. Previous work on RISC-V provides only manual construction of ROP attacks against specially crafted programs, and no analysis of ROP attacks has been conducted for ARM64 yet. Tobias Cloosters, David Paaßen, Oussama Draissi, Patrick Jauernig, Emmanuel Stapf, Lucas Davi, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi |
RAID | 4 |