Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leo Oliver

dblp:331/5888 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › routing security
prefix hijacking
0.612022
Stop, DROP, and ROA: effectiveness of defenses through the lens of DROP · IMC 2022
Network security
routing security
0.612022
Stop, DROP, and ROA: effectiveness of defenses through the lens of DROP · IMC 2022
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing
BGP
0.212022
Stop, DROP, and ROA: effectiveness of defenses through the lens of DROP · IMC 2022
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Stop, DROP, and ROA: effectiveness of defenses through the lens of DROP
abstract
We analyze the properties of 712 prefixes that appeared in Spamhaus' Don't Route Or Peer (DROP) list over a nearly three-year period from June 2019 to March 2022. We show that attackers are subverting multiple defenses against malicious use of address space, including creating fraudulent Internet Routing Registry records for prefixes shortly before using them. Other attackers disguised their activities by announcing routes with spoofed origin ASes consistent with historic route announcements, and in one case, with the ASN in a Route Origin Authorization. We quantify the substantial and actively-exploited attack surface in unrouted address space, which warrants reconsideration of RPKI eligibility restrictions by RIRs, and reconsideration of AS0 policies by both operators and RIRs.
Leo Oliver, Gautam Akiwate, Matthew J. Luckie, Ben Du, K. C. Claffy
IMC1