Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joey Rudek
dblp:332/2197
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 91% Energy-efficient computing · 9% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Going beyond the Limits of SFI: Flexible and Secure Hardware-Assisted In-Process Isolation with HFI · ASPLOS (3) 2023 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › front-end
micro-op cache |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Speculative Code Compaction: Eliminating Dead Code via Speculative Microcode Transformations · MICRO 2022 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprogramming |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Speculative Code Compaction: Eliminating Dead Code via Speculative Microcode Transformations · MICRO 2022 |
Systems and software security › memory safety › memory isolation
in-process isolation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Going beyond the Limits of SFI: Flexible and Secure Hardware-Assisted In-Process Isolation with HFI · ASPLOS (3) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gem5 simulation · 1.3compiler-based emulation · 1.3speculative microcode transformation · 0.6data dependence prediction · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Going beyond the Limits of SFI: Flexible and Secure Hardware-Assisted In-Process Isolation with HFIabstractWe introduce Hardware-assisted Fault Isolation (HFI), a simple extension to existing processors to support secure, flexible, and efficient in-process isolation. HFI addresses the limitations of existing software-based isolation (SFI) systems including: runtime overheads, limited scalability, vulnerability to Spectre attacks, and limited compatibility with existing code. HFI can seamlessly integrate with current SFI systems (e.g., WebAssembly), or directly sandbox unmodified native binaries. To ease adoption, HFI relies only on incremental changes to the data and control path of existing high-performance processors. We evaluate HFI for x86-64 using the gem5 simulator and compiler-based emulation on a mix of real and synthetic workloads. Shravan Narayan, Tal Garfinkel, Mohammadkazem Taram, Joey Rudek, Daniel Moghimi, Evan Johnson 0001, Chris Fallin, Anjo Vahldiek-Oberwagner, Michael LeMay, Ravi Sahita, Dean M. Tullsen, Deian Stefan |
ASPLOS (3) | 4 |
| 2022 | Speculative Code Compaction: Eliminating Dead Code via Speculative Microcode TransformationsabstractThe computing landscape has been increasingly characterized by processor architectures with increasing core counts, while a majority of the software applications remain inherently sequential. Although state-of-the-art compilers feature sophisticated optimizations, a significant chunk of wasteful computation persists due to the presence of data-dependent operations and irregular control-flow patterns that are unpredictable at compile-time. This work presents speculative code compaction (SCC), a novel microarchitectural technique that significantly enhances the capabilities of the microcode engine to aggressively and speculatively eliminate dead code from hot code regions resident in the micro-op cache, and further generate a compact stream of micro-ops, based on dynamically predicted machine code invariants. SCC also extends existing micro-op cache designs to co-host multiple versions of unoptimized and speculatively optimized micro-op sequences, providing the fetch engine with significant flexibility to dynamically choose from and stream the appropriate set of micro-ops, as and when deemed profitable.SCC is a minimally-invasive technique that can be implemented at the processor front-end using a simple ALU and a register context table, and is yet able to substantially accelerate the performance of already compile-time optimized and machine-tuned code by an average of 6% (and as much as 30%), with an average of 12% (and as much as 24%) savings in energy consumption, while eliminating the need for profiling and offering increased adaptability to changing datasets and workload patterns. Logan Moody, Abdolrasoul Sharifi, Layne Berry, Joey Rudek, Jayesh Gaur, Jeff Parkhurst, Sreenivas Subramoney, Kevin Skadron, Ashish Venkat |
MICRO | 5 |