The rapid adoption of personalized systems, driven by advancements in natural language processing, sensor technologies, and AI, has transformed the role of virtual personal assistants (VPAs), particularly in healthcare. While VPAs promise to enhance patient experiences through tailored support and adaptive workflows, their complexity often results in opaque functionalities hindering user understanding. This lack of transparency poses significant challenges, particularly in the context of informed consent, where users must comprehend the implications of sharing sensitive personal data. Existing consent systems often rely on static declarations and extensive documentation, which overwhelm users and fail to ensure informed decision-making. To address this problem, this paper presents a novel consent management approach integrated into the EREBOTSv3.0, an agent-based GDPR-compliant explainable framework for virtual assistants. The proposed solution introduces (i) an interactive method that structures consent into clear sections with summaries and examples to improve user comprehension and (ii) a question-based verification mechanism that assesses understanding and reinforces knowledge when needed. By leveraging EREBOTS’ modular architecture, real-time feedback, and secure data management, the proposed approach enhances transparency, fosters trust, and simplifies the consent understanding for dialog-based healthcare systems. This work lays the foundation for addressing critical challenges at the intersection of personalized AI, healthcare, and data protection.

The high GPU demand of ML training makes it hard to allocate large homogeneous clusters of high-end GPUs in a single availability zone. Leveraging heterogeneous GPUs available within and across zones can improve throughput at a reasonable cost. However, training ML models on heterogeneous resources introduces significant challenges, such as stragglers and a large search space of possible job configurations. Current systems lack support for efficiently training models on heterogeneous resources. We present Sailor, a system that automates distributed training over heterogeneous, geo-distributed, and dynamically available resources. Sailor combines an efficient search space exploration algorithm, accurate runtime and memory footprint simulation, and a distributed training framework that supports different types of heterogeneity to optimize training throughput and cost.

The awareness about healthy lifestyles is increasing, opening to personalized intelligent health coaching applications. A demand for more than mere suggestions and mechanistic interactions has driven attention to nutrition virtual coaching systems (NVC) as a bridge between human-machine interaction and recommender, informative, persuasive, and argumentation systems. NVC can rely on data-driven opaque mechanisms. Therefore, it is crucial to enable NVC to explain their doing (i.e., engaging the user in discussions (via arguments) about dietary solutions/alternatives). By doing so, transparency, user acceptance, and engagement are expected to be boosted. This study focuses on NVC agents generating personalized food recommendations based on user-specific factors such as allergies, eating habits, lifestyles, and ingredient preferences. In particular, we propose a user-agent negotiation process entailing run-time feedback mechanisms to react to both recommendations and related explanations. Lastly, the study presents the findings obtained by the experiments conducted with multi-background participants to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of the proposed system. The results indicate that most participants value the opportunity to provide feedback and receive explanations for recommendations. Additionally, the users are fond of receiving information tailored to their needs. Furthermore, our interactive recommendation system performed better than the corresponding traditional recommendation system in terms of effectiveness regarding the number of agreements and rounds.

Abstract Day by day, human-agent negotiation becomes more and more vital to reach a socially beneficial agreement when stakeholders need to make a joint decision together. Developing agents who understand not only human preferences but also attitudes is a significant prerequisite for this kind of interaction. Studies on opponent modeling are predominantly based on automated negotiation and may yield good predictions after exchanging hundreds of offers. However, this is not the case in human-agent negotiation in which the total number of rounds does not usually exceed tens. For this reason, an opponent model technique is needed to extract the maximum information gained with limited interaction. This study presents a conflict-based opponent modeling technique and compares its prediction performance with the well-known approaches in human-agent and automated negotiation experimental settings. According to the results of human-agent studies, the proposed model outpr erforms them despite the diversity of participants’ negotiation behaviors. Besides, the conflict-based opponent model estimates the entire bid space much more successfully than its competitors in automated negotiation sessions when a small portion of the outcome space was explored. This study may contribute to developing agents that can perceive their human counterparts’ preferences and behaviors more accurately, acting cooperatively and reaching an admissible settlement for joint interests.