Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emiliano Penaloza

dblp:334/1075 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3785-6796ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Language models and text generation · 25%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 82% Information retrieval · 18%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization
1.012026
Optimizing User Profiles via Contextual Bandits for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Personalization · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept bottleneck model
0.912025
Addressing Concept Mislabeling in Concept Bottleneck Models Through Preference Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
group relative policy optimization
0.912025
How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.912025
How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Addressing Concept Mislabeling in Concept Bottleneck Models Through Preference Optimization · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.912025
How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.912025
How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distillation
teacher-student distillation
0.912025
How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents › web agents
web agent training
0.912025
How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis · NeurIPS 2025
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.912025
TEARS: Text Representations for Scrutable Recommendations · WWW 2025
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
controllable recommendation
0.912025
TEARS: Text Representations for Scrutable Recommendations · WWW 2025
Recommender systems
explainable recommendation
0.912025
TEARS: Text Representations for Scrutable Recommendations · WWW 2025
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
variational autoencoder
0.912025
TEARS: Text Representations for Scrutable Recommendations · WWW 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contextual bandit · 1.0optimal transport · 0.9large language model · 0.9hyperparameter sensitivity analysis · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9bootstrapping · 0.9binary cross-entropy · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimizing User Profiles via Contextual Bandits for Retrieval-Augmented LLM Personalization
abstract
Linfeng Du, Ye Yuan, Zichen Zhao, Fuyuan Lyu, Emiliano Penaloza, Xiuying Chen, Zipeng Sun, Jikun Kang, Laurent Charlin, Xue Liu, Haolun Wu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Linfeng Du, Ye Yuan 0017, Fuyuan Lyu, Emiliano Penaloza, Xiuying Chen, Zipeng Sun, Jikun Kang, Laurent Charlin, Xue (Steve) Liu, Haolun Wu
ACL (1)5
2025 Addressing Concept Mislabeling in Concept Bottleneck Models Through Preference Optimization
abstract
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) propose to enhance the trustworthiness of AI systems by constraining their decisions on a set of human understandable concepts. However, CBMs typically rely on datasets with assumedly accurate concept labels—an assumption often violated in practice which we show can significantly degrade performance. To address this, we introduce the Concept Preference Optimization (CPO) objective, a new loss function based on Direct Preference Optimization, which effectively mitigates the negative impact of concept mislabeling on CBM performance. We provide an analysis on some key properties of the CPO objective showing it directly optimizes for the concept’s posterior distribution, and contrast it against Binary Cross Entropy (BCE) where we show CPO is inherently less sensitive to concept noise. We empirically confirm our analysis finding that CPO consistently outperforms BCE in three real-world datasets with and without added label noise
Emiliano Penaloza, Tianyue H. Zhang, Laurent Charlin, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga
ICML1
2025 How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis
abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents for web interfaces have advanced rapidly, yet open-source systems still lag behind proprietary agents. Bridging this gap is key to enabling customizable, efficient, and privacy-preserving agents. Two challenges hinder progress: the reproducibility issues in RL and LLM agent training, where results often depend on sensitive factors like seeds and decoding parameters, and the focus of prior work on single-step tasks, overlooking the complexities of web-based, multi-step decision-making. We address these gaps by providing a statistically driven study of training LLM agents for web tasks. Our two-stage pipeline combines imitation learning from a Llama 3.3 70B teacher with on-policy fine-tuning via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on a Llama 3.1 8B student. Through 240 configuration sweeps and rigorous bootstrapping, we chart the first compute allocation curve for open-source LLM web agents. Our findings show that dedicating one-third of compute to teacher traces and the rest to RL improves MiniWoB++ success by 6 points and closes 60\% of the gap to GPT-4o on WorkArena, while cutting GPU costs by 45\%. We introduce a principled hyperparameter sensitivity analysis, offering actionable guidelines for robust and cost-effective agent training.
Dheeraj Vattikonda, Santhoshi Ravichandran, Emiliano Penaloza, Hadi Nekoei, Thibault Le Sellier de Chezelles, Megh Thakkar, Nicolas Angelard-Gontier, Miguel Muñoz-Mármol, Sahar Omidi Shayegan, Stefania Raimondo, Steve (Xue) Liu, Alexandre Drouin, Alexandre Piché, Alexandre Lacoste, Massimo Caccia
NeurIPS3
2025 TEARS: Text Representations for Scrutable Recommendations
abstract
Traditional recommender systems rely on high-dimensional (latent) embeddings for modeling user-item interactions, often resulting in opaque representations that lack interpretability.Moreover, these systems offer limited control to users over their recommendations.Inspired by recent work, we introduce TExtuAl Representations for Scrutable recommendations (TEARS) to address these challenges.Instead of representing a user's interests through a latent embedding, TEARS encodes them in natural text, providing transparency and allowing users to edit them.To do so, TEARS uses a modern LLM to generate user summaries based on user preferences.Using these summaries, we take a hybrid approach where we use an optimal transport procedure to align the summaries' representation with the learned representation of a standard VAE for collaborative filtering.We find this approach can surpass the performance of popular VAE models while providing user-controllable recommendations.We also analyze the controllability of TEARS through three simulated user tasks to evaluate the effectiveness of a user editing its summary.A more detailed version of this manuscript with more experiments, baselines and detail is provided on arXiv.
Emiliano Penaloza, Olivier Gouvert, Haolun Wu, Laurent Charlin
WWW1