Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Perera
dblp:334/1626
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
winner-takes-all |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Annealed Multiple Choice Learning: Overcoming limitations of Winner-takes-all with annealing · NeurIPS 2024 Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimators · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
conditional density estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimators · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
multiple choice learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Annealed Multiple Choice Learning: Overcoming limitations of Winner-takes-all with annealing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization › zeroth-order optimization
simulated annealing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Annealed Multiple Choice Learning: Overcoming limitations of Winner-takes-all with annealing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimators · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech separation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Annealed Multiple Choice Learning: Overcoming limitations of Winner-takes-all with annealing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
winner-takes-all training · 0.8winner-takes-all · 0.8simulated annealing · 0.8centroidal voronoi tessellation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multiple Choice Learning for Efficient Speech Separation with Many SpeakersabstractTraining speech separation models in the supervised setting raises a permutation problem: finding the best assignation between the model predictions and the ground truth separated signals. This inherently ambiguous task is customarily solved using Permutation Invariant Training (PIT). In this article, we instead consider using the Multiple Choice Learning (MCL) framework, which was originally introduced to tackle ambiguous tasks. We demonstrate experimentally on the popular WSJ0-mix and LibriMix benchmarks that MCL matches the performances of PIT, while being computationally advantageous. This opens the door to a promising research direction, as MCL can be naturally extended to handle a variable number of speakers, or to tackle speech separation in the unsupervised setting. David Perera, François Derrida, Théo Mariotte, Gaël Richard, Slim Essid |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2024 | Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimatorsabstractWinner-takes-all training is a simple learning paradigm, which handles ambiguous tasks by predicting a set of plausible hypotheses. Recently, a connection was established between Winner-takes-all training and centroidal Voronoi tessellations, showing that, once trained, hypotheses should quantize optimally the shape of the conditional distribution to predict. However, the best use of these hypotheses for uncertainty quantification is still an open question. In this work, we show how to leverage the appealing geometric properties of the Winner-takes-all learners for conditional density estimation, without modifying its original training scheme. We theoretically establish the advantages of our novel estimator both in terms of quantization and density estimation, and we demonstrate its competitiveness on synthetic and real-world datasets, including audio data. Victor Letzelter, David Perera, Cédric Rommel, Mathieu Fontaine 0002, Slim Essid, Gaël Richard, Patrick Pérez |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Annealed Multiple Choice Learning: Overcoming limitations of Winner-takes-all with annealingabstractWe introduce Annealed Multiple Choice Learning (aMCL) which combines simulated annealing with MCL. MCL is a learning framework handling ambiguous tasks by predicting a small set of plausible hypotheses. These hypotheses are trained using the Winner-takes-all (WTA) scheme, which promotes the diversity of the predictions. However, this scheme may converge toward an arbitrarily suboptimal local minimum, due to the greedy nature of WTA. We overcome this limitation using annealing, which enhances the exploration of the hypothesis space during training. We leverage insights from statistical physics and information theory to provide a detailed description of the model training trajectory. Additionally, we validate our algorithm by extensive experiments on synthetic datasets, on the standard UCI benchmark, and on speech separation. David Perera, Victor Letzelter, Théo Mariotte, Adrien Cortés, Mickaël Chen, Slim Essid, Gaël Richard |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Development and user testing study of MozzHub: a bipartite network-based dengue hotspot detector
Jane Labadin, Boon Hao Hong, Wei King Tiong, Balvinder Singh Gill, David Perera, Andrew Ragai Henry Rigit, Sarbhan Singh, Cia Vei Tan, Sumarni Mohd Ghazali, Jenarun Jelip, Norhayati Mokhtar, Norafidah binti Abdul Rashid, Hazlin Bt Abu Bakar, Jyh Hann Lim, Norsyahida Md Taib, Aaron George |
Multim. Tools Appl. | 5 |