Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Teodora Reu
dblp:334/4500
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 91% Learning theory · 5% Robot navigation and mapping · 4% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Gradient Variance Reveals Failure Modes in Flow-Based Generative Models · NeurIPS 2025 Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient Variance Reveals Failure Modes in Flow-Based Generative Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
rectified flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient Variance Reveals Failure Modes in Flow-Based Generative Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
memorization and generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient Variance Reveals Failure Modes in Flow-Based Generative Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › sensor-based navigation
LiDAR-based navigation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient variance analysis · 0.9ODE vector field · 0.9riemannian geometry · 0.8geodesic interpolation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Gradient Variance Reveals Failure Modes in Flow-Based Generative ModelsabstractRectified Flows learn ODE vector fields whose trajectories are straight between source and target distributions, enabling near one-step inference. We show that this straight-path objective reveals fundamental failure modes: under deterministic training, low gradient variance drives memorization of arbitrary training pairings, even when interpolant lines between training pairs intersect. To analyze this mechanism, we study Gaussian-to-Gaussian transport and use the loss gradient variance across stochastic and deterministic regimes to characterize which vector fields optimization favors in each setting. We then show that, in a setting where all interpolating lines intersect, applying Rectified Flow yields the same specific pairings at inference as during training. More generally, we prove that a memorizing vector field exists even when training interpolants intersect, and that optimizing the straight-path objective converges to this ill-defined field. At inference, deterministic integration reproduces the exact training pairings. We validate our findings empirically on the CelebA dataset, confirming that deterministic interpolants induce memorization, while the injection of small noise restores generalization. Teodora Reu, Sixtine Dromigny, Michael M. Bronstein, Francisco Vargas 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Topological Message Passing for Higher - Order and Long - Range InteractionsabstractGraph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable success in learning from graph-structured data. However, they face significant limitations in expressive power, struggling with long-range interactions and lacking a principled approach to modeling higher-order structures and group interactions. Cellular Isomorphism Networks (CINs) recently addressed most of these challenges with a message passing scheme based on cell complexes. Despite their advantages, CINs make use only of boundary and upper messages which do not consider a direct interaction between the rings present in the underlying complex. Accounting for these interactions might be crucial for learning representations of many real-world complex phenomena such as the dynamics of supramolecular assemblies, neural activity within the brain, and gene regulation processes. In this work, we propose CIN++, an enhancement of the topological message passing scheme introduced in CINs. Our message passing scheme accounts for the aforementioned limitations by letting the cells receive also lower messages within each layer. By providing a more comprehensive representation of higher-order and long-range interactions, our enhanced topological message passing scheme achieves state-of-the-art results on large-scale and long-range chemistry benchmarks. Lorenzo Giusti, Teodora Reu, Francesco Ceccarelli, Cristian Bodnar, Pietro Liò |
IJCNN | 2 |
| 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data ManifoldabstractMatching objectives underpin the success of modern generative models and rely on constructing conditional paths that transform a source distribution into a target distribution. Despite being a fundamental building block, conditional paths have been designed principally under the assumption of $\textit{Euclidean geometry}$, resulting in straight interpolations. However, this can be particularly restrictive for tasks such as trajectory inference, where straight paths might lie outside the data manifold, thus failing to capture the underlying dynamics giving rise to the observed marginals. In this paper, we propose Metric Flow Matching (MFM), a novel simulation-free framework for conditional flow matching where interpolants are approximate geodesics learned by minimizing the kinetic energy of a data-induced Riemannian metric. This way, the generative model matches vector fields on the data manifold, which corresponds to lower uncertainty and more meaningful interpolations. We prescribe general metrics to instantiate MFM, independent of the task, and test it on a suite of challenging problems including LiDAR navigation, unpaired image translation, and modeling cellular dynamics. We observe that MFM outperforms the Euclidean baselines, particularly achieving SOTA on single-cell trajectory prediction. Kacper Kapusniak, Peter Potaptchik, Teodora Reu, Leo Zhang, Alexander Tong 0001, Michael M. Bronstein, Joey Bose, Francesco Di Giovanni |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | To smooth a cloud or to pin it down: Expressiveness guarantees and insights on score matching in denoising diffusion modelsabstractDenoising diffusion models are a class of generative models that have recently achieved state-of-the-art results across many domains. Gradual noise is added to the data using a diffusion process, which transforms the data distribution into a Gaussian. Samples from the generative model are then obtained by simulating an approximation of the time reversal of this diffusion initialized by Gaussian samples. Recent research has explored the sampling error achieved by diffusion models under the assumption of an absolute error $\epsilon$ achieved via a neural approximation of the score. To the best of our knowledge, no work formally quantifies the error of such neural approximation to the score. In this paper, we close the gap and present quantitative error bounds for approximating the score of denoising diffusion models using neural networks leveraging ideas from stochastic control. Finally, through simulation, we explore some of the insights that arise from our results confirming that diffusion models based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process require fewer parameters to better approximate the score than those based on the Fölmer drift / Pinned Brownian Motion. Teodora Reu, Francisco Vargas 0001, Anna Böhm, Michael M. Bronstein |
UAI | 1 |