Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jared Paul

dblp:336/3306 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 50% Energy-efficient computing · 25% Cloud and datacenter computing · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
complexity analysis
0.612022
Job Scheduling with Battery Recharging Constraints: Applications to UAV Flight Planning · RTSS 2022
Energy-efficient computing › energy-aware scheduling
energy-constrained scheduling
0.612022
Job Scheduling with Battery Recharging Constraints: Applications to UAV Flight Planning · RTSS 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing
job scheduling
0.612022
Job Scheduling with Battery Recharging Constraints: Applications to UAV Flight Planning · RTSS 2022
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.612022
Job Scheduling with Battery Recharging Constraints: Applications to UAV Flight Planning · RTSS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial-time algorithm design · 0.6complexity analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Job Scheduling with Battery Recharging Constraints: Applications to UAV Flight Planning
abstract
The need to understand job scheduling on devices with intermittent availability is of significant interest today because of the use of battery-powered devices - including electric vehicles - that rely on recharging intervals or energy harvesting. In some recent work by Islam and Nirjon, effective heuristics were proposed for scheduling recurring tasks with deadlines on such intermittently available devices. The broader computational complexity of job scheduling has not been explored in this setting where there is a relationship between job durations and energy consumption. We provide a richer understanding of this problem space. We consider two recharging approaches, one where the battery has to be fully charged during a recharging interval (sometimes considered better for extending battery lifetime) and another where the battery can be partially charged, and we study different scheduling objectives: minimizing the sum of completion times, minimizing the maximum tardiness, and minimizing the number of tardy jobs. We also consider four different relationships between job duration and energy consumption: (i) energy consumption is equal for all jobs irrespective of job length; (ii) job length is equal for all jobs irrespective of energy consumption; (iii) energy consumption is directly proportional to job length; and (iv) there is an arbitrary relationship between job length and energy consumption. In effect, we consider 24 different scheduling problems, and establish that most problems subject to a complete recharging requirement are NP-Hard but that most problems can be solved in polynomial time when partial recharging is permitted. Interestingly, we have been unable to resolve the computational complexity for the one case of minimizing the sum of completion times subject to partial recharging.
Sathish Gopalakrishnan, Nima Nasiri, Jared Paul
RTSS3