Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alejandro Velasquez
dblp:336/5520
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 83% Legged, aerial and field robots · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic evaluation of a suction based gripper for fruit picking using a physical twin · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
gripper design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic evaluation of a suction based gripper for fruit picking using a physical twin · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping › grasping mechanism
suction cup grasping |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic evaluation of a suction based gripper for fruit picking using a physical twin · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic evaluation of a suction based gripper for fruit picking using a physical twin · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics › agricultural robotics
robotic harvesting |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic evaluation of a suction based gripper for fruit picking using a physical twin · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
physical twin evaluation · 0.8in-hand perception · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Dynamic evaluation of a suction based gripper for fruit picking using a physical twinabstractWe present and evaluate a novel suction-based gripper designed for fruit picking. This work is motivated by common problems observed in field trials of robotic harvesting: Calibration/perception errors, workspace obstacles, fruit swinging/moving when contacted, and varying stem and branch stiffnesses. The gripper consists of three suction-cups located on the palm, along with in-hand perception. To evaluate the gripper, we developed a physical proxy that approximates a realistic apple-stem-branch dynamic system. We performed 756 apple picks on the proxy with varying branch stiffness, stem strength and gripper pose (yaw, roll and offset w.r.t. the apple). Our results show that grasping performance improves when the gripper yaw w.r.t. the apple has two suction cups on the bottom of the apple and one suction cup on top. Even with ±15mm offset, at least two suction cups engaged with the apple 80% of the time, regardless of branch stiffness. Moreover, the gripper withstands ±20mm offset when it approaches the apple near its equator. Alejandro Velasquez, Cindy Grimm, Joseph R. Davidson |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2022 | Predicting fruit-pick success using a grasp classifier trained on a physical proxyabstractApple picking is a challenging manipulation task, but it is difficult to test solutions due to the limited window of time that apples are in season. Previous methods have built simulations of apple trees, but simulations rarely capture soft contact and deformation well, both of which are common in fruit picking. In this paper we present and validate a physical proxy that replicates the mechanics of a real world apple pick. This proxy, in conjunction with a novel hand with multiple sensors, enables large-scale capture of sensor data for data collection and testing. To validate our approach, we train a Long Short-Term Memory network to classify a pick as successful or failed based on sensor feedback from the robot hand. We show that a network trained on the proxy performs as well, or even better, than a network trained solely on real apple trees, with accuracies up to 90%. We determine which sensors are most important for pick classification and also demonstrate that our proxy preserves the most important sensor feature data for pick classification. For our hand, the most informative sensor was the finger's servomotor effort. Alejandro Velasquez, Nigel Swenson, Miranda Cravetz, Cindy Grimm, Joseph R. Davidson |
IROS | 1 |