Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingran Yang

dblp:336/9183 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient Search · ICSE 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness evaluation
fairness testing
0.812024
MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient Search · ICSE 2024
Software testing › machine learning testing
fairness testing
0.812024
MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient Search · ICSE 2024
Software testing
machine learning testing
0.812024
MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient Search · ICSE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-order gradient estimation · 1.5black-box testing · 1.5attribute perturbation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DeepCTL: Neural Branching-Time CTL Satisfiability Checking via Recursive Decision Trees
Bingchang Yuan, Jingran Yang, Bojie Shao, Min Zhang 0007
ICANN (1)4
2024 Making Fair Classification via Correlation Alignment
abstract
Machine learning learns patterns from data to improve the performance of the decision-making systems through computing, and gradually affects people’s lives. However, it shows that in current research machine learning algorithms may reinforce human discrimination, and exacerbate negative impacts on unprivileged groups. To mitigate potential unfairness in machine learning classifiers, we propose a fair classification approach by quantifying the difference in the prediction distribution with the idea of correlation alignment in transfer learning, which improves fairness efficiently by minimizing the second-order statistical distance of the prediction distribution. We evaluate the validity of our approach on four real-world datasets. It demonstrates that our approach significantly mitigates bias w.r.t demographic parity, equality of opportunity, and equalized odds across different groups in a classification setting, and achieves better trade-off between accuracy and fairness than previous work. In addition, our approach can further improve fairness and mitigate the fair conflict problem in debiased networks.
Jingran Yang, Min Zhang 0007
ECAI1
2024 MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient Search
abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown powerful performance in various applications and are increasingly being used in decisionmaking systems. However, concerns about fairness in DNNs always persist. Some efficient white-box fairness testing methods about individual fairness have been proposed. Nevertheless, the development of black-box methods has stagnated, and the performance of existing methods is far behind that of white-box methods. In this paper, we propose a novel black-box individual fairness testing method called Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing (MAFT). By leveraging MAFT, practitioners can effectively identify and address discrimination in DL models, regardless of the specific algorithm or architecture employed. Our approach adopts lightweight procedures such as gradient estimation and attribute perturbation rather than non-trivial procedures like symbol execution, rendering it significantly more scalable and applicable than existing methods. We demonstrate that MAFT achieves the same effectiveness as state-of-the-art white-box methods whilst improving the applicability to large-scale networks. Compared to existing black-box approaches, our approach demonstrates distinguished performance in discovering fairness violations w.r.t effectiveness (~ 14.69×) and efficiency (~ 32.58×).
Min Zhang 0007, Jingran Yang, Bojie Shao, Min Zhang 0002
ICSE3
2022 Mountain Snow Depth Retrieval From Optical and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing Using Machine Learning
abstract
Snow depth or snow water equivalent in mountainous region is crucial for hydrology, water resources management, meteorological and climate research. Remote sensing can be used for snow depth monitoring in regional scale or global scale. However, the spaceborne remote sensing of snow depth in mountain is challenging because of the sensor sensitivity and spatial resolution problems. Recently, time series Sentinel-1 is used for snow depth retrieval in mountains, which shows encouraging accuracy. In this study, an algorithm to estimate the snow depth in mountainous regions using optical and passive microwave remote sensing observations is proposed, which can be applied in periods before and after the launch of Sentinel-1. The optical and passive microwave remote sensing observations and the Sentinel-1 derived snow depth in 2016-2021 are used to train the snow depth retrieval algorithm using the Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning algorithm. Validations are performed using cross validation method and independentin-situsnow depth data. The cross validation shows correlation coefficient of 0.81 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.17m. The correlation coefficient and MAE of predicted snow depth andin-situsnow depth in 2002-2016 are 0.61 and 0.33 m, respectively, which shows significant higher accuracy compared with AMSR-E/AMSR2 snow depth products. The site dependence of the machine learning method is also discussed. The machine learning based snow depth retrieval presented in this study can be applied to mountains globally to the optical and passive microwave remote sensing era.
Chuan Xiong, Jingran Yang, Jinmei Pan, Yonghui Lei, Jiancheng Shi 0001
IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett.2