Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pulkit Sinha
dblp:337/1784
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-9289-3776ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 62% Computational complexity · 19% Algorithms and data structures · 14% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state tomography |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dimension Independent and Computationally Efficient Shadow Tomography · STOC 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state tomography
shadow tomography |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dimension Independent and Computationally Efficient Shadow Tomography · STOC 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum learning theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Lower Bounds for Quantum Learning via Information Theory · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum learning theory
quantum sample complexity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Lower Bounds for Quantum Learning via Information Theory · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Information theory › information-theoretic limits
information-theoretic lower bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Lower Bounds for Quantum Learning via Information Theory · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Lower Bounds for Quantum Learning via Information Theory · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantum measurements · 0.9reduction · 0.8holevo information · 0.8gram matrix spectrum analysis · 0.8algebraic complexity · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dimension Independent and Computationally Efficient Shadow Tomography
Pulkit Sinha |
STOC | 1 |
| 2024 | NP-Hardness of Testing Equivalence to Sparse Polynomials and to Constant-Support Polynomials
Omkar Baraskar, Agrim Dewan, Chandan Saha 0001, Pulkit Sinha |
ICALP | 4 |
| 2024 | Optimal Lower Bounds for Quantum Learning via Information TheoryabstractAlthough a concept class may be learnt more efficiently using quantum samples as compared with classical samples in certain scenarios, quantum learners are asymptotically no more efficient than classical ones in the quantum PAC and Agnostic learning models. Lower bounds on sample complexity in these models were previously established via quantum state identification and Fourier analysis. In this paper, we derive optimal lower bounds for quantum sample complexity in both models via an information-theoretic approach. The proofs are arguably simpler, and the same ideas can potentially be used to derive optimal bounds for other problems in quantum learning theory. We then turn to a quantum analogue of the Coupon Collector problem, a classic problem from probability theory also of importance in the study of PAC learning. The quantum sample complexity of this problem has been characterised up to constant factors. First, we show that the information-theoretic approach mentioned above provably does not yield the optimal lower bound. As a by-product, we get a natural ensemble of pure states in arbitrarily high dimensions which are not easily (simultaneously) distinguishable, whereas the ensemble has close to maximal Holevo information. Second, we discover that the information-theoretic approach yields an asymptotically optimal bound for an approximation variant of the problem. Finally, we derive a sharper lower bound for the Quantum Coupon Collector problem via the generalised Holevo-Curlander bounds. All the aspects of the problem we study rest on properties of the spectrum of the associated Gram matrix, which may be of independent interest. Shima Bab Hadiashar, Ashwin Nayak 0001, Pulkit Sinha |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |