Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Venturini
dblp:337/9463
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2704-2094ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › software compatibility
breaking changes |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | I Depended on You and You Broke Me: An Empirical Study of Manifesting Breaking Changes in Client Packages · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2023 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | I Depended on You and You Broke Me: An Empirical Study of Manifesting Breaking Changes in Client Packages · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2023 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems › software ecosystem analysis
package ecosystem analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | I Depended on You and You Broke Me: An Empirical Study of Manifesting Breaking Changes in Client Packages · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2023 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software dependencies |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | I Depended on You and You Broke Me: An Empirical Study of Manifesting Breaking Changes in Client Packages · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2023 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems
dependency management |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | I Depended on You and You Broke Me: An Empirical Study of Manifesting Breaking Changes in Client Packages · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
versioning analysis · 0.7empirical analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | I Depended on You and You Broke Me: An Empirical Study of Manifesting Breaking Changes in Client PackagesabstractComplex software systems have a network of dependencies. Developers often configure package managers (e.g., npm ) to automatically update dependencies with each publication of new releases containing bug fixes and new features. When a dependency release introduces backward-incompatible changes, commonly known as breaking changes , dependent packages may not build anymore. This may indirectly impact downstream packages, but the impact of breaking changes and how dependent packages recover from these breaking changes remain unclear. To close this gap, we investigated the manifestation of breaking changes in the npm ecosystem, focusing on cases where packages’ builds are impacted by breaking changes from their dependencies. We measured the extent to which breaking changes affect dependent packages. Our analyses show that around 12% of the dependent packages and 14% of their releases were impacted by a breaking change during updates of non-major releases of their dependencies. We observed that, from all of the manifesting breaking changes, 44% were introduced in both minor and patch releases, which in principle should be backward compatible. Clients recovered themselves from these breaking changes in half of the cases, most frequently by upgrading or downgrading the provider’s version without changing the versioning configuration in the package manager. We expect that these results help developers understand the potential impact of such changes and recover from them. Daniel Venturini, Filipe Roseiro Côgo, Ivanilton Polato, Marco Aurélio Gerosa, Igor Scaliante Wiese |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 1 |