Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Labake Odushegun
dblp:338/5847
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 77% User interface design and tools · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research › user affect
emotional experience |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Aesthetic semantics: Affect rating of atomic visual web aesthetics for use in affective user experience design · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2023 |
User interface design and tools
aesthetic design |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Aesthetic semantics: Affect rating of atomic visual web aesthetics for use in affective user experience design · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical study · 0.7affect rating · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Aesthetic semantics: Affect rating of atomic visual web aesthetics for use in affective user experience designabstractAesthetic principle not only concerns the perception of visual beauty, but most crucially, the cognitive-affective responses derived from experiencing such stimuli. Despite this knowledge, user experience (UX) designers often prioritise beauty over intended end-user affect. This reversed order of prioritisation contradicts the sequential UX design process, leading to unexpected end-user perceptions and responses. The challenge in shaping UX before user interface (UI) design is that there first must be prior knowledge of aesthetic affect. A study with 1,782 worldwide participants was conducted evaluating affective user-responses to 43 atomic aesthetics using 153,252 data points and presented as affect ratings (ARs). Results demonstrated high affective resonance amongst aesthetics evaluated, suggesting aesthetic AR may be a viable method of improving the UX design process by influencing user perceptions, responses and actions at a non-conscious level. This is the first of a series of studies in the direction of Aesthetic Semantics®. Labake Odushegun |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |