Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neta Glazer
dblp:339/0335
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning paradigms · 27% Optimization for machine learning · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASR · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASR · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
auxiliary learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-task optimization
task balancing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASR · AAAI 2026 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › negotiation
bargaining game |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convergence analysis · 1.3bargaining game · 1.3logit lens · 1.0linear probing · 1.0activation patching · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASRabstractInterpretability methods have recently gained significant attention, particularly in the context of large language models, enabling insights into linguistic representations, error detection, and model behaviors such as hallucinations and repetitions. However, these techniques remain underexplored in automatic speech recognition (ASR), despite their potential to advance both the performance and interpretability of ASR systems. In this work, we adapt and systematically apply established interpretability methods such as logit lens, linear probing, and activation patching, to examine how acoustic and semantic information evolves across layers in ASR systems. Our experiments reveal previously unknown internal dynamics, including specific encoder-decoder interactions responsible for repetition hallucinations and semantic biases encoded deep within acoustic representations. These insights demonstrate the benefits of extending and applying interpretability techniques to speech recognition, opening promising directions for future research on improving model transparency and robustness. Neta Glazer, Yael Segal-Feldman, Hilit Segev, Aviv Shamsian, Asaf Buchnick, Gill Hetz, Ethan Fetaya, Joseph Keshet, Aviv Navon |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Few-Shot Speech Deepfake Detection Adaptation with Gaussian Processes
Neta Glazer, David Chernin, Idan Achituve, Sharon Gannot, Ethan Fetaya |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2025 | FlowTSE: Target Speaker Extraction with Flow Matching
Aviv Navon, Aviv Shamsian, Yael Segal-Feldman, Neta Glazer, Gil Hetz, Joseph Keshet |
INTERSPEECH | 4 |
| 2024 | Open-Vocabulary Keyword-Spotting with Adaptive Instance NormalizationabstractOpen vocabulary keyword spotting is a crucial and challenging task in automatic speech recognition (ASR) that focuses on detecting user-defined keywords within a spoken utterance. Keyword spotting methods commonly map the audio utterance and keyword into a joint embedding space to obtain some affinity score. In this work, we propose AdaKWS, a novel method for keyword spotting in which a text encoder is trained to output keyword-conditioned normalization parameters. These parameters are used to process the auditory input. We provide an extensive evaluation using challenging and diverse multi-lingual benchmarks and show significant improvements over recent keyword spotting and ASR baselines. Furthermore, we study the effectiveness of our approach on low-resource languages that were unseen during the training. The results demonstrate a substantial performance improvement compared to baseline methods. Aviv Navon, Aviv Shamsian, Neta Glazer, Gill Hetz, Joseph Keshet |
ICASSP | 3 |
| 2024 | Keyword-Guided Adaptation of Automatic Speech Recognition
Aviv Shamsian, Aviv Navon, Neta Glazer, Gill Hetz, Joseph Keshet |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2023 | Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining GameabstractAuxiliary learning is an effective method for enhancing the generalization capabilities of trained models, particularly when dealing with small datasets. However, this approach may present several difficulties: (i) optimizing multiple objectives can be more challenging, and (ii) how to balance the auxiliary tasks to best assist the main task is unclear. In this work, we propose a novel approach, named AuxiNash, for balancing tasks in auxiliary learning by formalizing the problem as generalized bargaining game with asymmetric task bargaining power. Furthermore, we describe an efficient procedure for learning the bargaining power of tasks based on their contribution to the performance of the main task and derive theoretical guarantees for its convergence. Finally, we evaluate AuxiNash on multiple multi-task benchmarks and find that it consistently outperforms competing methods. Aviv Shamsian, Aviv Navon, Neta Glazer, Kenji Kawaguchi, Gal Chechik, Ethan Fetaya |
ICML | 3 |