Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Latisha Boor

dblp:339/2298 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2501-3839ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › human behavior modeling › social perception
stereotype content model
0.712023
Models of (Often) Ambivalent Robot Stereotypes: Content, Structure, and Predictors of Robots' Age and Gender Stereotypes · HRI 2023
Human-robot interaction › anthropomorphism
robot appearance
0.212023
Models of (Often) Ambivalent Robot Stereotypes: Content, Structure, and Predictors of Robots' Age and Gender Stereotypes · HRI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online survey · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Models of (Often) Ambivalent Robot Stereotypes: Content, Structure, and Predictors of Robots' Age and Gender Stereotypes
abstract
This study focused on investigating the content, structure, and predictors of robots' stereotypes. We involved 120 participants in an online study and asked them to rate 80 robots on communion, agency, suitability for female and suitability for male tasks. In line with the stereotype content model, we discovered that robots' stereotypes are described by two dimensions, communion and agency, which combine to form univalent (e.g., low communion/low agency), as well as ambivalent clusters (e.g., low communion/high agency). Moreover, we found out that a robot's stereotypical appearance has a role in activating stereotypes. Indeed, in our study, female robots featuring appearance cues socio-culturally associated with femininity (e.g., eyelashes or apparel) were perceived as more communal, and juvenile robots featuring appearance cues tapping into the baby schema (e.g., cartoony eyes) were perceived as more communal, less agentic, and less suited to perform tasks. Given the renowned relationship between stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination, the causal link between appearance and stereotyping we establish in this paper can help HRI researchers disentangle the relation between robots' design and people's behavioral tendencies towards them, including proneness to harm.
Giulia Perugia, Latisha Boor, Laura van der Bij, Okke Rikmenspoel, Robin Foppen, Stefano Guidi
HRI2