Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Johannes Aspman

dblp:339/6715 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › quantized neural network
binary neural network
0.812024
Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.812024
Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming
0.812024
Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212024
Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subadditive duality · 1.5implicit differentiation · 1.5backpropagation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs
abstract
There has been a great deal of recent interest in binarized neural networks, especially because of their explainability. At the same time, automatic differentiation algorithms such as backpropagation fail for binarized neural networks, which limits their applicability. We show that binarized neural networks admit a tame representation by reformulating the problem of training binarized neural networks as a subadditive dual of a mixed-integer program, which we show to have nice properties. This makes it possible to use the framework of Bolte et al. for implicit differentiation, which offers the possibility for practical implementation of backpropagation in the context of binarized neural networks. This approach could also be used for a broader class of mixed-integer programs, beyond the training of binarized neural networks, as encountered in symbolic approaches to AI and beyond.
Johannes Aspman, Georgios Korpas, Jakub Marecek
AAAI1