Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johannes Aspman
dblp:339/6715
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › quantized neural network
binary neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer Programs · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subadditive duality · 1.5implicit differentiation · 1.5backpropagation · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Taming Binarized Neural Networks and Mixed-Integer ProgramsabstractThere has been a great deal of recent interest in binarized neural networks, especially because of their explainability. At the same time, automatic differentiation algorithms such as backpropagation fail for binarized neural networks, which limits their applicability. We show that binarized neural networks admit a tame representation by reformulating the problem of training binarized neural networks as a subadditive dual of a mixed-integer program, which we show to have nice properties. This makes it possible to use the framework of Bolte et al. for implicit differentiation, which offers the possibility for practical implementation of backpropagation in the context of binarized neural networks. This approach could also be used for a broader class of mixed-integer programs, beyond the training of binarized neural networks, as encountered in symbolic approaches to AI and beyond. Johannes Aspman, Georgios Korpas, Jakub Marecek |
AAAI | 1 |