Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liangxiao Ma
dblp:339/6877
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9103-4913ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 83% Medical and health informatics · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug combination prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dual-view jointly learning improves personalized drug synergy prediction · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dual-view jointly learning improves personalized drug synergy prediction · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › drug combination prediction
drug synergy prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dual-view jointly learning improves personalized drug synergy prediction · Bioinform. 2024 |
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
personalized treatment |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dual-view jointly learning improves personalized drug synergy prediction · Bioinform. 2024 |
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dual-view jointly learning improves personalized drug synergy prediction · Bioinform. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-tuning · 0.8dual-view jointly learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Dual-view jointly learning improves personalized drug synergy predictionabstractMOTIVATION: Accurate and robust estimation of the synergistic drug combination is important for medicine precision. Although some computational methods have been developed, some predictions are still unreliable especially for the cross-dataset predictions, due to the complex mechanism of drug combinations and heterogeneity of cancer samples. RESULTS: We have proposed JointSyn that utilizes dual-view jointly learning to predict sample-specific effects of drug combination from drug and cell features. JointSyn outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in predictive accuracy and robustness across various benchmarks. Each view of JointSyn captures drug synergy-related characteristics and makes complementary contributes to the final prediction of the drug combination. Moreover, JointSyn with fine-tuning improves its generalization ability to predict a novel drug combination or cancer sample using a small number of experimental measurements. We also used JointSyn to generate an estimated atlas of drug synergy for pan-cancer and explored the differential pattern among cancers. These results demonstrate the potential of JointSyn to predict drug synergy, supporting the development of personalized combinatorial therapies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and data are available at https://github.com/LiHongCSBLab/JointSyn. Xueliang Li 0017, Bihan Shen, Fangyoumin Feng, Kunshi Li, Zhixuan Tang, Liangxiao Ma |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2023 | A systematic assessment of deep learning methods for drug response prediction: from in vitro to clinical applicationsabstractDrug response prediction is an important problem in personalized cancer therapy. Among various newly developed models, significant improvement in prediction performance has been reported using deep learning methods. However, systematic comparisons of deep learning methods, especially of the transferability from preclinical models to clinical cohorts, are currently lacking. To provide a more rigorous assessment, the performance of six representative deep learning methods for drug response prediction using nine evaluation metrics, including the overall prediction accuracy, predictability of each drug, potential associated factors and transferability to clinical cohorts, in multiple application scenarios was benchmarked. Most methods show promising prediction within cell line datasets, and TGSA, with its lower time cost and better performance, is recommended. Although the performance metrics decrease when applying models trained on cell lines to patients, a certain amount of power to distinguish clinical response on some drugs can be maintained using CRDNN and TGSA. With these assessments, we provide a guidance for researchers to choose appropriate methods, as well as insights into future directions for the development of more effective methods in clinical scenarios. Bihan Shen, Fangyoumin Feng, Kunshi Li, Liangxiao Ma |
Briefings Bioinform. | 5 |