Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew McHutchon

dblp:34/11107 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 38% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Motion planning and robot control · 19%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.212014
Policy search for learning robot control using sparse data · ICRA 2014
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy search
0.212014
Policy search for learning robot control using sparse data · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.212014
Policy search for learning robot control using sparse data · ICRA 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.112011
Gaussian Process Training with Input Noise · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.112011
Gaussian Process Training with Input Noise · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum marginal likelihood estimation
0.112011
Gaussian Process Training with Input Noise · NIPS 2011
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.112014
Policy search for learning robot control using sparse data · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.2probabilistic inference for learning control · 0.2gaussian process · 0.2local linear expansion · 0.1iterative hyperparameter optimization · 0.1analytic predictive moments · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Policy search for learning robot control using sparse data
abstract
In many complex robot applications, such as grasping and manipulation, it is difficult to program desired task solutions beforehand, as robots are within an uncertain and dynamic environment. In such cases, learning tasks from experience can be a useful alternative. To obtain a sound learning and generalization performance, machine learning, especially, reinforcement learning, usually requires sufficient data. However, in cases where only little data is available for learning, due to system constraints and practical issues, reinforcement learning can act suboptimally. In this paper, we investigate how model-based reinforcement learning, in particular the probabilistic inference for learning control method (Pilco), can be tailored to cope with the case of sparse data to speed up learning. The basic idea is to include further prior knowledge into the learning process. As Pilco is built on the probabilistic Gaussian processes framework, additional system knowledge can be incorporated by defining appropriate prior distributions, e.g. a linear mean Gaussian prior. The resulting Pilco formulation remains in closed form and analytically tractable. The proposed approach is evaluated in simulation as well as on a physical robot, the Festo Robotino XT. For the robot evaluation, we employ the approach for learning an object pick-up task. The results show that by including prior knowledge, policy learning can be sped up in presence of sparse data.
Bastian Bischoff, Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Herke van Hoof, Andrew McHutchon, Carl E. Rasmussen, Alois C. Knoll, Jan Peters 0001, Marc Peter Deisenroth
ICRA4
2011 Gaussian Process Training with Input Noise
abstract
In standard Gaussian Process regression input locations are assumed to be noise free. We present a simple yet effective GP model for training on input points corrupted by i.i.d. Gaussian noise. To make computations tractable we use a local linear expansion about each input point. This allows the input noise to be recast as output noise proportional to the squared gradient of the GP posterior mean. The input noise variances are inferred from the data as extra hyperparameters. They are trained alongside other hyperparameters by the usual method of maximisation of the marginal likelihood. Training uses an iterative scheme, which alternates between optimising the hyperparameters and calculating the posterior gradient. Analytic predictive moments can then be found for Gaussian distributed test points. We compare our model to others over a range of different regression problems and show that it improves over current methods.
Andrew McHutchon, Carl E. Rasmussen
NIPS1