Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David J. Gilmore
dblp:34/2134
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 10 · 5 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software maintenance and evolution · 44% Debugging and program repair · 44% Empirical software engineering · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
program comprehension |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Comprehension and Recall of Miniature Programs · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1984 |
Debugging and program repair
software debugging |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | An Investigation of the Utility of Flowcharts During Computer Program Debugging · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1984 |
Computing education › programming education
novice programming |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Comprehension and Recall of Miniature Programs · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1984 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Breaking the Rules of Direct Manipulation
David Golightly, David J. Gilmore |
INTERACT | 2 |
| 1997 | Ballons, Boats and Ponies: Interface manipulation style and learning in a constraint-based planning task
Shirley J. Holst, Elizabeth F. Churchill, David J. Gilmore |
INTERACT | 3 |
| 1996 | Delivering Cognitive Psychology to HCI: The Problems of Common Language and of Knowledge TransferabstractAlthough cognitive psychology showed much initial promise, it has failed to make significant contributions to the study of human-computer interaction, which has led to a rejection of cognitivism in favour of situated action theory. The authors accept that the critique has much to offer, but reject the outright abandoning of cognitivism. Cognitive psychology needs a common language in which to describe interaction between people and artifacts: two examples of research in progress are described, one focused on events, the other on representations and the relationship between the information display and the conceptual model. Cognitive psychology also needs a better delivery method than the traditional research paper, and the idea is proposed of a vocabulary of ‘cognitive dimensions’, terms which can be meaningfully used by non-specialists (who will recognise familiar but uncrystallised concepts) and which can be used as indexes to the professional literature. These two components form a proposal for improving the effectiveness of cognitive psychology. The paper ends with the hope that mainstream cognitive psychology will broaden its area of enquiry. Thomas R. G. Green, Simon P. Davies, David J. Gilmore |
Interact. Comput. | 3 |
| 1995 | Interface design: have we got it wrong?
David J. Gilmore |
INTERACT | 1 |
| 1995 | Learning graphical programming: an evaluation of KidSimTM
David J. Gilmore, Karen Pheasey, Jean Underwood 0001, Geoffrey M. Underwood |
INTERACT | 1 |
| 1995 | Are Objects That Important? Effects of Expertise and Familiarity on Classification of Object-Oriented Code
Simon P. Davies, David J. Gilmore, Thomas R. G. Green |
Hum. Comput. Interact. | 2 |
| 1992 | Towards a cognitive browser for OOPSabstractSoftware engineers have developed sophisticated “object‐oriented” programming environments that are intended to make the reuse of program code easy. Experience has shown that these environments can be improved: Even very experienced programmers have problems in locating and comprehending code for reuse. Programs cannot be modified as readily as had been anticipated. We describe the problems in terms of “cognitive dimensions” of notational systems and show how improved support for opportunistic design may be achieved. A central tenet is that programmers are not at present able to externalize enough of their knowledge about a program. We propose a scheme for attaching a “description level” in which arbitrary attributes and relationships can be recorded in a “browsable” form. Our conclusions stress improving the means for programmers to represent facts rather than the provision of predefined knowledge bases. Thomas R. G. Green, David J. Gilmore, B. B. Blumenthal, Simon P. Davies, Russel L. Winder |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. | 2 |
| 1991 | Book Review: "Studying the Novice Programmer, " edited by E. Soloway and J. C. Spohrer
David J. Gilmore |
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. | 1 |
| 1984 | Comprehension and Recall of Miniature Programs
David J. Gilmore, Thomas R. G. Green |
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. | 1 |
| 1984 | An Investigation of the Utility of Flowcharts During Computer Program Debugging
David J. Gilmore, H. T. Smith |
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. | 1 |