Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Snorre A. Helvik

dblp:34/3723 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112007
Reliable prediction of Drosha processing sites improves microRNA gene prediction · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
microRNA gene prediction
0.112007
Reliable prediction of Drosha processing sites improves microRNA gene prediction · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.1classifier · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Reliable prediction of Drosha processing sites improves microRNA gene prediction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Mature microRNAs (miRNAs) are processed from long hairpin transcripts. Even though it is only the first of several steps, the initial Drosha processing defines the mature product and is characteristic for all miRNA genes. Methods that can separate between true and false processing sites are therefore essential to miRNA gene discovery. RESULTS: We present a classifier that predicts 5' Drosha processing sites in hairpins that are candidate miRNAs. The classifier, called Microprocessor SVM, correctly predicts the processing site for 50% of known human 5' miRNAs, and 90% of its predictions are within two nucleotides of the true site. Another classifier that is trained on the output from the Microprocessor SVM outperforms existing methods for prediction of unconserved miRNAs. Reanalysis of characteristics and supporting evidence for a set of newly annotated miRNAs shows that some miRNAs may be misannotated. This suggests that expressed hairpins should not be annotated as miRNAs until they are verified to be Drosha and Dicer substrates. AVAILABILITY: The classifiers are publicly available at https://demo1.interagon.com/miRNA/
Snorre A. Helvik, Ola R. Snøve Jr., Pål Sætrom
Bioinform.1