Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yaacov Ritov
dblp:34/4054
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Language models and text generation · 24% Learning theory · 24% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A transfer learning framework for weak to strong generalization · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment › scalable oversight
weak-to-strong generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A transfer learning framework for weak to strong generalization · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
performative prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning in reverse causal strategic environments with ramifications on two sided markets · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › performative prediction
strategic classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning in reverse causal strategic environments with ramifications on two sided markets · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Inference In High-dimensional Single-Index Models Under Symmetric Designs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › semiparametric inference
single-index model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Inference In High-dimensional Single-Index Models Under Symmetric Designs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Identifying a Minimal Class of Models for High-dimensional Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization › regularized regression
lasso |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Identifying a Minimal Class of Models for High-dimensional Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Identifying a Minimal Class of Models for High-dimensional Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Identifying a Minimal Class of Models for High-dimensional Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
algorithmic fairness |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning in reverse causal strategic environments with ramifications on two sided markets · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Inference In High-dimensional Single-Index Models Under Symmetric Designs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Manifold Learning: The Price of Normalization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
local learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | How Local Should a Learning Method Be? · COLT 2008 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Manifold Learning: The Price of Normalization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Some Theory for Generalized Boosting Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Some Theory for Generalized Boosting Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor fusion
multi-sensor tracking |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Tracking Many Objects with Many Sensors · IJCAI 1999 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Tracking Many Objects with Many Sensors · IJCAI 1999 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Tracking Many Objects with Many Sensors · IJCAI 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
refinement-based training · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9equilibrium modeling · 0.8causal strategic classification · 0.8hermite polynomial basis · 0.5elliptical symmetry · 0.5debiased lasso · 0.5simulated annealing · 0.3lasso · 0.3elastic net · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A transfer learning framework for weak to strong generalizationabstractModern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether the techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In particular, it is unclear whether it is possible to align (stronger) LLMs with superhuman capabilities with (weaker) human feedback *without degrading their capabilities*. This is an instance of the weak-to-strong generalization problem: using weaker (less capable) feedback to train a stronger (more capable) model. We prove that weak-to-strong generalization is possible by eliciting latent knowledge from pre-trained LLMs. In particular, we cast the weak-to-strong generalization problem as a transfer learning problem in which we wish to transfer a latent concept from a weak model to a strong pre-trained model. We prove that a naive fine-tuning approach suffers from fundamental limitations, but an alternative refinement-based approach suggested by the problem structure provably overcomes the limitations of fine-tuning. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the refinement approach in multiple LLM alignment tasks. Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee, Yaacov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | Learning in reverse causal strategic environments with ramifications on two sided marketsabstractMotivated by equilibrium models of labor markets, we develop a formulation of causal strategic classification in which strategic agents can directly manipulate their outcomes. As an application, we consider employers that seek to anticipate the strategic response of a labor force when developing a hiring policy. We show theoretically that employers with performatively optimal hiring policies improve employer reward, labor force skill level, and labor force equity (compared to employers that do not anticipate the strategic labor force response) in the classic Coate-Loury labor market model. Empirically, we show that these desirable properties of performative hiring policies do generalize to our own formulation of a general equilibrium labor market. On the other hand, we also observe that the benefits of performatively optimal hiring policies are brittle in some aspects. We demonstrate that in our formulation a performative employer both harms workers by reducing their aggregate welfare and fails to prevent discrimination when more sophisticated wage and cost structures are introduced. Seamus Somerstep, Yuekai Sun, Yaacov Ritov |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Inference In High-dimensional Single-Index Models Under Symmetric DesignsabstractThe problem of statistical inference for regression coefficients in a high-dimensional single-index model is considered. Under elliptical symmetry, the single index model can be reformulated as a proxy linear model whose regression parameter is identifiable. We construct estimates of the regression coefficients of interest that are similar to the debiased lasso estimates in the standard linear model and exhibit similar properties: $\sqrt{n}$-consistency and asymptotic normality. The procedure completely bypasses the estimation of the unknown link function, which can be extremely challenging depending on the underlying structure of the problem. Furthermore, under Gaussianity, we propose more efficient estimates of the coefficients by expanding the link function in the Hermite polynomial basis. Finally, we illustrate our approach via carefully designed simulation experiments. Hamid Eftekhari, Moulinath Banerjee, Yaacov Ritov |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2017 | Identifying a Minimal Class of Models for High-dimensional DataabstractModel selection consistency in the high--dimensional regression setting can be achieved only if strong assumptions are fulfilled. We therefore suggest to pursue a different goal, which we call a minimal class of models. The minimal class of models includes models that are similar in their prediction accuracy but not necessarily in their elements. We suggest a random search algorithm to reveal candidate models. The algorithm implements simulated annealing while using a score for each predictor that we suggest to derive using a combination of the lasso and the elastic net. The utility of using a minimal class of models is demonstrated in the analysis of two data sets. Daniel Nevo, Yaacov Ritov |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2009 | Consistency and Localizability
Alon Zakai, Yaacov Ritov |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2009 | Local procrustes for manifold embedding: a measure of embedding quality and embedding algorithms
Yair Goldberg, Yaacov Ritov |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2008 | How Local Should a Learning Method Be?
Alon Zakai, Yaacov Ritov |
COLT | 2 |
| 2008 | Manifold Learning: The Price of Normalization
Yair Goldberg, Alon Zakai, Dan Kushnir, Yaacov Ritov |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2006 | Some Theory for Generalized Boosting AlgorithmsabstractWe give a review of various aspects of boosting, clarifying the issues through a few simple results, and relate our work and that of others to the minimax paradigm of statistics. We consider the population version of the boosting algorithm and prove its convergence to the Bayes classifier as a corollary of a general result about Gauss-Southwell optimization in Hilbert space. We then investigate the algorithmic convergence of the sample version, and give bounds to the time until perfect separation of the sample. We conclude by some results on the statistical optimality of the L2 boosting. Peter J. Bickel, Yaacov Ritov, Alon Zakai |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 1999 | Tracking Many Objects with Many Sensors
Hanna M. Pasula, Stuart Russell 0001, Michael Ostland, Yaacov Ritov |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 1995 | Estimating linear functionals of a PET imageabstractThe authors discuss the effect of having a finite number of detectors on the estimation of a bounded linear functional of a PET image. They argue that the functional should be estimated directly from the detector counts and give an estimate of the effect of the binning of the counts to order D(-2), where D is the number of detectors. The authors then suggest an estimator that includes a data determined bias correction reducing the bias to o(D(-2)). Peter J. Bickel, Yaacov Ritov |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 2 |