Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matt DeVos

dblp:34/4229 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 48% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 32% Computational geometry · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness › extractors
affine extractors
0.112010
Simple Affine Extractors Using Dimension Expansion · CCC 2010
Computational geometry › computational topology
combinatorial surfaces
0.112010
Finding one tight cycle · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2010
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness
extractors
0.112010
Simple Affine Extractors Using Dimension Expansion · CCC 2010
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness
0.112010
Simple Affine Extractors Using Dimension Expansion · CCC 2010
Graph algorithms and graph theory › topological graph theory
topological graph algorithms
0.112010
Finding one tight cycle · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2010
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph embedding
0.012008
Finding one tight cycle · SODA 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subspace product dimension bound · 0.1shortest path algorithms · 0.1homotopy algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 On Minimizing the Energy of a Spherical Graph Representation
Matt DeVos, Danielle Rogers, Alexandra Wesolek
GD (2)1
2014 Packing Triangles in Weighted Graphs
abstract
Tuza conjectured that for every graph $G$ the maximum size $\nu$ of a set of edge-disjoint triangles and minimum size $\tau$ of a set of edges meeting all triangles satisfy $\tau \leq 2\nu$. We consider an edge-weighted version of this conjecture, which amounts to packing and covering triangles in multigraphs. Several known results about the original problem are shown to be true in this context, and some are improved. In particular, we answer a question of Krivelevich, who proved that $\tau \leq 2\nu^*$ (where $\nu^*$ is the fractional version of $\nu$) and asked whether this is tight. We prove that $\tau \leq 2\nu^*-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\sqrt{\nu^*}$ and show that this bound is essentially best possible.
Guillaume Chapuy, Matt DeVos, Jessica McDonald, Bojan Mohar, Diego Scheide
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
2010 Simple Affine Extractors Using Dimension Expansion
abstract
Let Fqbe the field of q elements. An (n, k)-affine extractor is a mapping D : Fqn→ {0,1} such that for any k-dimensional affine subspace X ⊆ Fqn, D(x) is an almost unbiased bit when x is chosen uniformly from X. Loosely speaking, the problem of explicitly constructing affine extractors gets harder as q gets smaller and easier as k gets larger. This is reflected in previous results: When q is 'large enough', specifically q = Ω(n2), Gabizon and Raz construct affine extractors for any k ≥ 1. In the 'hardest case', i.e. when q = 2, Bourgain constructs affine extractors for k ≥ δn for any constant (and even slightly subconstant) δ > 0. Our main result is the following: Fix any k ≥ 2 and let d = 5n/k. Then whenever q > 2 · d2and p = char(Fq) > d, we give an explicit (n, k)-affine extractor. For example, when k = δn for constant δ > 0, we get an extractor for a field of constant size Ω((1/δ)2). We also get weaker results for fields of arbitrary characteristic (but can still work with a constant field size when k = δn for constant δ > 0). Thus our result may be viewed as a 'field-size/dimension' tradeoff for affine extractors. For a wide range of k this gives a new result, but even for large k where we do not improve (or even match) the previous result of, we believe that our construction and proof have the advantage of being very simple: Assume n is prime and d is odd, and fix any non-trivial linear map T : Fqn→ Fq. Define QR : Fq→ {0,1} by QR(x) = 1 if and only if x is a quadratic residue. Then, the function D : Fqn→ {0,1} defined by D(x) =△QR(T(xd)) is an (n, k)-affine extractor. Our proof uses a result of Heur, Leung and Xiang giving a lower bound on the dimension of products of subspaces.
Matt DeVos, Ariel Gabizon
CCC1
2010 An Eberhard-Like Theorem for Pentagons and Heptagons
Matt DeVos, Agelos Georgakopoulos, Bojan Mohar, Robert Sámal
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2010 Finding one tight cycle
abstract
A cycle on a combinatorial surface is tight if it as short as possible in its (free) homotopy class. We describe an algorithm to compute a single tight, noncontractible, essentially simple cycle on a given orientable combinatorial surface in O ( n log n ) time. The only method previously known for this problem was to compute the globally shortest noncontractible or nonseparating cycle in O (min{ g 3 , n }, n log n ) time, where g is the genus of the surface. As a consequence, we can compute the shortest cycle freely homotopic to a chosen boundary cycle in O ( n log n ) time, a tight octagonal decomposition in O ( gn log n ) time, and a shortest contractible cycle enclosing a nonempty set of faces in O ( n log 2 n ) time.
Sergio Cabello, Matt DeVos, Jeff Erickson 0001, Bojan Mohar
ACM Trans. Algorithms2
2008 Finding one tight cycle
Sergio Cabello, Matt DeVos, Jeff Erickson 0001, Bojan Mohar
SODA2
2007 Circular Coloring the Plane
abstract
The unit distance graph $\mathcal{R}$ is the graph with vertex set $\mathbb{R}^2$ in which two vertices (points in the plane) are adjacent if and only if they are at Euclidean distance 1. We prove that the circular chromatic number of $\mathcal{R}$ is at least 4, thus improving the known lower bound of $32/9$ obtained from the fractional chromatic number of $\mathcal{R}$.
Matt DeVos, Javad B. Ebrahimi, Mohammad Ghebleh, Luis A. Goddyn, Bojan Mohar, Reza Naserasr
SIAM J. Discret. Math.1