Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Melinda T. Gervasio
dblp:34/4725
· DBLP profile ↗
24ranked-venue papers
9as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 12 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 72% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 24% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 2% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Confidence Calibration for Domain Generalization under Covariate Shift · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Confidence Calibration for Domain Generalization under Covariate Shift · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interestingness elements for explainable reinforcement learning: Understanding agents' capabilities and limitations · Artif. Intell. 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interestingness elements for explainable reinforcement learning: Understanding agents' capabilities and limitations · Artif. Intell. 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Confidence Calibration for Domain Generalization under Covariate Shift · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Learning User Evaluation Functions for Adaptive Scheduling Assistance · ICML 1999 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Learning User Evaluation Functions for Adaptive Scheduling Assistance · ICML 1999 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
incremental learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | An Incremental Learning Approach for Completable Planning · ICML 1994 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning › inference-time reasoning
deliberation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | On Becoming Decreasingly Reactive: Learning to Deliberate Minimally · ML 1991 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › machine learning for planning
plan learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Learning General Completable Reactive Plans · AAAI 1990 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
reactive planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Learning General Completable Reactive Plans · AAAI 1990 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explanation-based learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Explanation-Based Learning of Reactive Operations · ML 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple calibration domains · 0.5calibration transfer · 0.5learning user evaluation functions · 0.0incremental learning · 0.0explanation-based learning · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Confidence Calibration for Domain Generalization under Covariate ShiftabstractExisting calibration algorithms address the problem of covariate shift via unsupervised domain adaptation. However, these methods suffer from the following limitations: 1) they require unlabeled data from the target domain, which may not be available at the stage of calibration in real-world applications and 2) their performance depends heavily on the disparity between the distributions of the source and target domains. To address these two limitations, we present novel calibration solutions via domain generalization. Our core idea is to leverage multiple calibration domains to reduce the effective distribution disparity between the target and calibration domains for improved calibration transfer without needing any data from the target domain. We provide theoretical justification and empirical experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms. Compared against state-of-the-art calibration methods designed for domain adaptation, we observe a decrease of 8.86 percentage points in expected calibration error or, equivalently, an increase of 35 percentage points in improvement ratio for multi-class classification on the Office-Home dataset. Yunye Gong, Thomas G. Dietterich, Ajay Divakaran, Melinda T. Gervasio |
ICCV | 6 |
| 2020 | Interestingness elements for explainable reinforcement learning: Understanding agents' capabilities and limitations
Pedro Sequeira, Melinda T. Gervasio |
Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2017 | Evaluating intelligent knowledge systems: experiences with a user-adaptive assistant agent
Pauline M. Berry, Thierry Donneau-Golencer, Khang Duong, Melinda T. Gervasio, Bart Peintner, Neil Yorke-Smith |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 4 |
| 2016 | Solution Authoring via Demonstration and Annotation: An Empirical StudyabstractA major impediment to the widespread deployment of intelligent training systems is the high cost of developing the content that drives their operation. Techniques grounded in end-user programming have shown great promise for reducing the burden of content creation. With these approaches, a domain expert demonstrates a solution to a task, which is then generalized to a broader model. This paper reports on a concept validation study that provides an empirical basis for the design of solution authoring frameworks based on end-user programming techniques. The study shows that non-expert users are comfortable with the approach and are capable of applying it to generate quality solution models. It also identifies constructs that, while important for accurate solution characterization, can lead to confusion and so warrant special care in tool design. Based on these results, we make recommendations for the design of solution-authoring tools in support of automated assessment for tutoring systems. Karen L. Myers, Melinda T. Gervasio |
ICALT | 2 |
| 2013 | Drill Evaluation for Training Procedural Skills
Karen L. Myers, Melinda T. Gervasio, Christian Jones, Kyle McIntyre, Kellie Keifer |
AIED | 2 |
| 2013 | Discovering action idioms bridging the gap between system-level events and human-level actionsabstractAs computing devices become more pervasive in our daily lives, effective communication between the user and the system becomes increasingly important. The ability to describe actions at a human level of abstraction is key. However, the level at which computer system events is most easily captured is often well below the level at which humans conceptualize actions. We present a sequential pattern mining approach to discovering human-level actions-action idioms - from instrumentation logs of lower-level events. To support validation by a human expert, idiom discovery is designed to maximize recall, with filtering heuristics applied to help eliminate false positives. Empirical evaluation on data from a fielded application shows the promise of the approach for the automatic discovery of action idioms. Melinda T. Gervasio, Thomas J. Lee |
VL/HCC | 1 |
| 2011 | Learning by Demonstration Technology for Military Planning and Decision Making: A Deployment StoryabstractLearning by demonstration technology has long held the promise to empower non-programmers to customize and extend software. We describe the deployment of a learning by demonstration capability to support user creation of automated procedures in a collaborative planning environment that is used widely by the U.S. Army. This technology, which has been in operational use since the summer of 2010, has helped to reduce user workloads by automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks. The technology has also provided the unexpected benefit of enabling standardization of products and processes. Karen L. Myers, Jake Kolojejchick, Carl Angiolillo, Tim Cummings, Tom Garvey, Melinda T. Gervasio, Will Haines, Chris Jones 0002, Janette Knittel, David N. Morley, William Ommert, Scott Potter |
IAAI | 6 |
| 2011 | How to serve soup: interleaving demonstration and assisted editing to support nonprogrammersabstractThe Adept Task Learning system is an end-user programming environment that combines programming by demonstration and direct manipulation to support customization by nonprogrammers. Previously, Adept enforced a rigid procedure-authoring workflow consisting of demonstration followed by editing. However, a series of system evaluations with end users revealed a desire for more feedback during learning and more flexibility in authoring. We present a new approach that interleaves incremental learning from demonstration and assisted editing to provide users with a more flexible procedure-authoring experience. The approach relies on maintaining a "soup" of alternative hypotheses during learning, propagating user edits through the soup, and suggesting repairs as needed. We discuss the learning and reasoning techniques that support the new approach and identify the unique interaction design challenges they raise, concluding with an evaluation plan to resolve the design challenges and complete the improved system. Melinda T. Gervasio, Will Haines, David N. Morley, Thomas J. Lee, Adam Overholtzer, Shahin Saadati, Aaron Spaulding |
IUI | 1 |
| 2011 | Learning to ask the right questions to help a learner learnabstractIntelligent systems require substantial bodies of problem-solving knowledge. Machine learning techniques hold much appeal for acquiring such knowledge but typically require extensive amounts of user-supplied training data. Alternatively, informed question asking can supplement machine learning by directly eliciting critical knowledge from a user. Question asking can reduce the amount of training data required, and hence the burden on the user; furthermore, focused question asking holds significant promise for faster and more accurate acquisition of knowledge. In previous work, we developed static strategies for question asking that provide background knowledge for a base learner, enabling the learner to make useful generalizations even with few training examples. Here, we extend that work with a learning approach for automatically acquiring question-asking strategies that better accommodate the interdependent nature of questions. We present experiments validating the approach and showing its usefulness for acquiring efficient, context-dependent question-asking strategies. Melinda T. Gervasio, Eric Yeh, Karen L. Myers |
IUI | 1 |
| 2011 | PTIME: Personalized assistance for calendaringabstractIn a world of electronic calendars, the prospect of intelligent, personalized time management assistance seems a plausible and desirable application of AI. PTIME ( Personalized Time Management ) is a learning cognitive assistant agent that helps users handle email meeting requests, reserve venues, and schedule events. PTIME is designed to unobtrusively learn scheduling preferences, adapting to its user over time. The agent allows its user to flexibly express requirements for new meetings, as they would to an assistant. It interfaces with commercial enterprise calendaring platforms, and it operates seamlessly with users who do not have PTIME. This article overviews the system design and describes the models and technical advances required to satisfy the competing needs of preference modeling and elicitation, constraint reasoning, and machine learning. We further report on a multifaceted evaluation of the perceived usefulness of the system. Pauline M. Berry, Melinda T. Gervasio, Bart Peintner, Neil Yorke-Smith |
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. | 2 |
| 2009 | Evaluating User-Adaptive Systems: Lessons from Experiences with a Personalized Meeting Scheduling Assistant
Pauline M. Berry, Thierry Donneau-Golencer, Khang Duong, Melinda T. Gervasio, Bart Peintner, Neil Yorke-Smith |
IAAI | 4 |
| 2009 | Learning by Demonstration to Support Military Planning and Decision Making
Thomas D. Garvey, Melinda T. Gervasio, Thomas J. Lee, Karen L. Myers, Carl Angiolillo, Matthew E. Gaston, Janette Knittel, Jake Kolojejchick |
IAAI | 2 |
| 2009 | What were you thinking?: filling in missing dataflow through inference in learning from demonstrationabstractRecent years have seen a resurgence of interest in programming by demonstration. As end users have become increasingly sophisticated, computer and artificial intelligence technology has also matured, making it feasible for end users to teach long, complex procedures. This paper addresses the problem of learning from demonstrations involving unobservable (e.g., mental) actions. We explore the use of knowledge base inference to complete missing dataflow and investigate the approach in the context of the CALO cognitive personal desktop assistant. We experiment with the Pathfinder utility, which efficiently finds all the relationships between any two objects in the CALO knowledge base. Pathfinder often returns too many paths to present to the user and its default shortest path heuristic sometimes fails to identify the correct path. We develop a set of filtering techniques for narrowing down the results returned by Pathfinder and present experimental results showing that these techniques effectively reduce the alternative paths to a small, meaningful set suitable for presentation to a user. Melinda T. Gervasio, Janet L. Murdock |
IUI | 1 |
| 2009 | From geek to sleek: integrating task learning tools to support end users in real-world applicationsabstractNumerous techniques exist to help users automate repetitive tasks; however, none of these methods fully support end-user creation, use, and modification of the learned tasks. We present an integrated task learning system (ITL) that learns executable procedures based on user demonstration and instruction, constituting a first step toward a broader solution for procedure management. We discuss our deployment of ITL into a collaborative command-and-control system. In this complex domain, ITL's performance with end users doing real tasks indicates that providing multiple, integrated learning techniques both extends functionality and improves user experience. Our experience in integrat-ing this system also provides key insights for future designs of domain-independent task learning systems, specifically in supporting users' ability to understand and edit lengthy procedures. Aaron Spaulding, Jim Blythe, Will Haines, Melinda T. Gervasio |
IUI | 4 |
| 2005 | Active preference learning for personalized calendar scheduling assistanceabstractWe present PLIANT, a learning system that supports adaptive assistance in an open calendaring system. PLIANT learns user preferences from the feedback that naturally occurs during interactive scheduling. It contributes a novel application of active learning in a domain where the choice of candidate schedules to present to the user must balance usefulness to the learning module with immediate benefit to the user. Our experimental results provide evidence of PLIANT's ability to learn user preferences under various conditions and reveal the tradeoffs made by the different active learning selection strategies. Melinda T. Gervasio, Michael D. Moffitt, Martha E. Pollack, Joseph M. Taylor, Tomás E. Uribe |
IUI | 1 |
| 2003 | An adaptive stock tracker for personalized trading adviceabstractThe Stock Tracker is an adaptive recommendation system for trading stocks that automatically acquires content-based models of user preferences to tailor its buy and sell advice. The system incorporates an efficient algorithm that exploits the fixed structure of user models and relies on unobtrusive data-gathering techniques. In this paper, we describe our approach to personalized recommendation and its implementation in this domain. We also discuss experiments that evaluate the system's behavior on both human subjects and synthetic users. The results suggest that the Stock Tracker can rapidly adapt its advice to different types of users Jungsoon P. Yoo, Melinda T. Gervasio, Pat Langley |
IUI | 2 |
| 2003 | Personalized trading recommendation systemabstractThe Stock Tracker is a personalized recommendation system for trading stocks. The system tailors its buy, sell, and hold recommendations to individual users through automatically acquired content-based models of user preferences. It relies on data gathered unobtrusively during the natural course of interacting with a user. Jungsoon P. Yoo, Melinda T. Gervasio, Pat Langley |
IUI | 2 |
| 1999 | Learning User Evaluation Functions for Adaptive Scheduling Assistance
Melinda T. Gervasio, Wayne Iba, Pat Langley |
ICML | 1 |
| 1999 | Adapting to User Preferences in Crisis ResponseabstractThe domain of crisis planning and scheduling taxes human response managers due to high levels of urgency and uncertainty.Such applications require assistant technologies (in contrast to automation technologies) and provide special challenges for interface design.We present INCA, the INteractive Crisis Assistant, that helps users develop effective crisis response plans and schedules in a timely manner.INCA also adapts to the individual users by anticipating their preferred responses to a given crisis and their intended repairs to a candidate response.We evaluate our system in HAZMAT, a synthetic domain involving hazardous material incidents.The results show that INCA provides effective support for the timely generation of effective responses and tailors itself to individual users. Wayne Iba, Melinda T. Gervasio |
IUI | 2 |
| 1994 | An Incremental Learning Approach for Completable Planning
Melinda T. Gervasio, Gerald DeJong |
ICML | 1 |
| 1993 | Explanation-based learning for intelligent process planningabstractThe possibility of applying explanation-based learning (EBL), a technique from machine learning, to intelligent process planning is explored. There are currently two major approaches to process planning: the variant approach and the generative approach. Each has advantages and deficiencies. The authors' hypothesis is that EBL could successfully unite these apparently disparate approaches. EBL can be used to transform a traditional weak method planner into a strong method skeletal planner by acquiring strong method concepts which are generalized weak-method explanations of observed episodes. It would seem to be a natural vehicle to unite variant and generative process planning. A learning process planner, called EXBLIPP is implemented to test the authors' hypothesis. It is found that the system possesses many of the intended advantages. It is demonstrated that the EBL capability enables the process planning system to learn new schemata which yield many of the advantages of variant process planning.> Melinda T. Gervasio, Michael J. Shaw, Gerald DeJong |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. | 2 |
| 1991 | On Becoming Decreasingly Reactive: Learning to Deliberate Minimally
Steve A. Chien, Melinda T. Gervasio, Gerald DeJong |
ML | 2 |
| 1990 | Learning General Completable Reactive Plans
Melinda T. Gervasio |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1989 | Explanation-Based Learning of Reactive Operations
Melinda T. Gervasio, Gerald DeJong |
ML | 1 |