Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Minqing Hu
dblp:34/5312
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Data mining · 60% Information retrieval · 27% Distributed and cloud data management · 8% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 92% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 8% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | BigBench: towards an industry standard benchmark for big data analytics · SIGMOD Conference 2013 |
Data mining › text mining
sentiment analysis |
0.2 | 3 | 2006 | Opinion Extraction and Summarization on the Web · AAAI 2006 Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web · WWW 2005 Mining Opinion Features in Customer Reviews · AAAI 2004 |
Information retrieval
text analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Opinion Extraction and Summarization on the Web · AAAI 2006 Mining Opinion Features in Customer Reviews · AAAI 2004 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
opinion summarization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Opinion Extraction and Summarization on the Web · AAAI 2006 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web · WWW 2005 |
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
review mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web · WWW 2005 |
Visualization and visual analytics › text visualization
opinion visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web · WWW 2005 |
Distributed and cloud data management
big data systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | BigBench: towards an industry standard benchmark for big data analytics · SIGMOD Conference 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
review mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Mining and summarizing customer reviews · KDD 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Mining and summarizing customer reviews · KDD 2004 |
Data mining
text mining |
0.0 | 2 | 2006 | Opinion Extraction and Summarization on the Web · AAAI 2006 Mining Opinion Features in Customer Reviews · AAAI 2004 |
Data mining › pattern mining
association rule mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Multi-level organization and summarization of the discovered rules · KDD 2000 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Multi-level organization and summarization of the discovered rules · KDD 2000 |
Data mining › pattern mining › interesting pattern mining
rule interestingness |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Multi-level organization and summarization of the discovered rules · KDD 2000 |
Web and social media mining
web mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Opinion Extraction and Summarization on the Web · AAAI 2006 |
Web and social media mining
e-commerce |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Mining and summarizing customer reviews · KDD 2004 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge base
knowledge base management |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Multi-level organization and summarization of the discovered rules · KDD 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visualization · 0.1language pattern mining · 0.1opinion extraction · 0.1rule summarization · 0.1feature extraction · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | BigBench: towards an industry standard benchmark for big data analyticsabstractThere is a tremendous interest in big data by academia, industry and a large user base. Several commercial and open source providers unleashed a variety of products to support big data storage and processing. As these products mature, there is a need to evaluate and compare the performance of these systems. Ahmad Ghazal, Tilmann Rabl, Minqing Hu, Francois Raab, Meikel Pöss, Alain Crolotte, Hans-Arno Jacobsen |
SIGMOD Conference | 3 |
| 2006 | Opinion Extraction and Summarization on the Web
Minqing Hu, Bing Liu 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2005 | Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the WebabstractThe Web has become an excellent source for gathering consumer opinions. There are now numerous Web sites containing such opinions, e.g., customer reviews of products, forums, discussion groups, and blogs. This paper focuses on online customer reviews of products. It makes two contributions. First, it proposes a novel framework for analyzing and comparing consumer opinions of competing products. A prototype system called Opinion Observer is also implemented. The system is such that with a single glance of its visualization, the user is able to clearly see the strengths and weaknesses of each product in the minds of consumers in terms of various product features. This comparison is useful to both potential customers and product manufacturers. For a potential customer, he/she can see a visual side-by-side and feature-by-feature comparison of consumer opinions on these products, which helps him/her to decide which product to buy. For a product manufacturer, the comparison enables it to easily gather marketing intelligence and product benchmarking information. Second, a new technique based on language pattern mining is proposed to extract product features from Pros and Cons in a particular type of reviews. Such features form the basis for the above comparison. Experimental results show that the technique is highly effective and outperform existing methods significantly. Bing Liu 0001, Minqing Hu, Junsheng Cheng |
WWW | 2 |
| 2004 | Mining Opinion Features in Customer Reviews
Minqing Hu, Bing Liu 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2004 | Mining and summarizing customer reviewsabstractMerchants selling products on the Web often ask their customers to review the products that they have purchased and the associated services. As e-commerce is becoming more and more popular, the number of customer reviews that a product receives grows rapidly. For a popular product, the number of reviews can be in hundreds or even thousands. This makes it difficult for a potential customer to read them to make an informed decision on whether to purchase the product. It also makes it difficult for the manufacturer of the product to keep track and to manage customer opinions. For the manufacturer, there are additional difficulties because many merchant sites may sell the same product and the manufacturer normally produces many kinds of products. In this research, we aim to mine and to summarize all the customer reviews of a product. This summarization task is different from traditional text summarization because we only mine the features of the product on which the customers have expressed their opinions and whether the opinions are positive or negative. We do not summarize the reviews by selecting a subset or rewrite some of the original sentences from the reviews to capture the main points as in the classic text summarization. Our task is performed in three steps: (1) mining product features that have been commented on by customers; (2) identifying opinion sentences in each review and deciding whether each opinion sentence is positive or negative; (3) summarizing the results. This paper proposes several novel techniques to perform these tasks. Our experimental results using reviews of a number of products sold online demonstrate the effectiveness of the techniques. Minqing Hu, Bing Liu 0001 |
KDD | 1 |
| 2002 | Using micro information units for internet searchabstractInternet search is one of the most important applications of the Web. A search engine takes the user's keywords to retrieve and to rank those pages that contain the keywords. One shortcoming of existing search techniques is that they do not give due consideration to the micro-structures of a Web page. A Web page is often populated with a number of small information units, which we call micro information units (MIU). Each unit focuses on a specific topic and occupies a specific area of the page. During the search, if all the keywords in the user query occur in a single MIU of a page, the top ranking results returned by a search engine are generally relevant and useful. However, if the query words scatter at different MIUs in a page, the pages returned can be quite irrelevant (which causes low precision). The reason for this is that although a page has information on individual MIUs, it may not have information on their intersections. In this paper, we propose a technique to solve this problem. At the off-line pre-processing stage, we segment each page to identify the MIUs in the page, and index the keywords of the page according to the MIUs in which they occur. In searching, our retrieval and ranking algorithm utilizes this additional information to return those most relevant pages. Experimental results show that this method is able to significantly improve the search precision. Xiaoli Li 0001, Tong-Heng Phang, Minqing Hu, Bing Liu 0001 |
CIKM | 3 |
| 2000 | Multi-level organization and summarization of the discovered rulesabstractMany existing data mining techniques often produce a large number of rules, which make it very difficult for manual inspection of the rules to identify those interesting ones. This problem represents a major gap between the results of data mining and the understanding and use of the mining results. In this paper, we argue that the key problem is not with the large number of rules because if there are indeed many rules that exist in data, they should be discovered. The main problem is with our inability to organize, summarize and present the rules in such a way that they can be easily analyzed by the user. In this paper, we propose a technique to intuitively organize and summarize the discovered rules. With this organization, the discovered rules can be presented to the user in the way as we think and talk about knowledge in our daily lives. This organization also allows the user to view the discovered rules at different levels of details, and to focus his/her attention on those interes... Bing Liu 0001, Minqing Hu, Wynne Hsu |
KDD | 2 |