Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adriana Zapico
dblp:34/6365
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 92% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Logic in computer science · 57% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 43% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative decision theory |
0.1 | 2 | 2001 | Weakening Commensurability Hypothesis in Possibilistic Qualitative Decision Theory · IJCAI 2001 Axiomatic Foundations for Qualitative/Ordinal Decisions with Partial Preferences · IJCAI 1999 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative decision making |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Making Decision in a Qualitative Setting: from Decision under Uncertaintly to Case-based Decision · KR 1998 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Making Decision in a Qualitative Setting: from Decision under Uncertaintly to Case-based Decision · KR 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
case-based reasoning · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Weakening Commensurability Hypothesis in Possibilistic Qualitative Decision Theory
Adriana Zapico |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2001 | On the Possibilistic-Based Decision Model: Characterization of Preference Relations Under Partial Inconsistency
Lluís Godo, Adriana Zapico |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 2000 | Representation of Preference Relations Induced by Lattice-Valued, Generalized Possibilistic Utility FunctionsabstractRepresentational issues of preferences in the framework of a possibilistic ordinal decision model under uncertainty were introduced by Dubois and Prade a few years ago. In this framework, finite, linear, commensurate uncertainty and preference scales are assumed and decisions are ranked according to their expected utility in terms of Sugeno integrals. In this paper we generalise the model by allowing (i) to measure uncertainty and preferences on finite, distributive lattices with involution, and (ii) to formulate the utility expectations in terms of generalized Sugeno integrals where t-norms and t-conorms play a role. For these generalized utility functions we provide axiomatic characterisations. Finally, we also briefly comment the case of working with belief states that may be partially inconsistent, which is usual in case-based decision making problems or when several inconsistent sources of information are available. Adriana Zapico, Lluís Godo |
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. | 1 |
| 1999 | Axiomatic Foundations for Qualitative/Ordinal Decisions with Partial Preferences
Adriana Zapico |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1999 | On the Possibilistic Deceision Model: From Decesion under Uncertainty to Case-Based DecesionabstractThis paper improves a previously proposed axiomatic setting for qualitative decision under uncertainty in the von Neumann and Morgenstern' style, where only ordinal linear scales are required for assessing uncertainty and utility. Two qualitative criteria are axiomatized in a finite setting: a pessimistic one and an optimistic one, respectively obeying an uncertainty aversion axiom and an uncertainty-attraction axiom. These criteria generalize the well-known maximin and maximax criteria, making them more realistic. They are suited to one-shot decisions and they are not based on the notion of mean value, but take the form of medians. Elements for a qualitative case-based decision methodology are also proposed, with pessimistic and optimistic evaluations formally similar to the expressions which cope with uncertainty, up to modifying factors which cope with the lack of normalization of similarity evaluations. Finally two extensions of the model are analysed: (i) the case of generalized possibilistic mixtures, using a t-norm instead of min, and (ii) the case of evaluating either preferences or uncertainty on Cartesian products of ordinal scales. Didier Dubois, Lluís Godo, Henri Prade, Adriana Zapico |
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. | 4 |
| 1998 | Making Decision in a Qualitative Setting: from Decision under Uncertaintly to Case-based Decision
Didier Dubois, Lluís Godo, Henri Prade, Adriana Zapico |
KR | 4 |