Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiajuan Liang
dblp:34/8023
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Learning paradigms · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
representative sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
sample selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum mean discrepancy · 0.8frank-wolfe algorithm · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample SelectionabstractSemi-Supervised Learning (SSL) has become a preferred paradigm in many deep learning tasks, which reduces the need for human labor. Previous studies primarily focus on effectively utilising the labelled and unlabeled data to improve performance. However, we observe that how to select samples for labelling also significantly impacts performance, particularly under extremely low-budget settings. The sample selection task in SSL has been under-explored for a long time. To fill in this gap, we propose a Representative and Diverse Sample Selection approach (RDSS). By adopting a modified Frank-Wolfe algorithm to minimise a novel criterion $\alpha$-Maximum Mean Discrepancy ($\alpha$-MMD), RDSS samples a representative and diverse subset for annotation from the unlabeled data. We demonstrate that minimizing $\alpha$-MMD enhances the generalization ability of low-budget learning. Experimental results show that RDSS consistently improves the performance of several popular SSL frameworks and outperforms the state-of-the-art sample selection approaches used in Active Learning (AL) and Semi-Supervised Active Learning (SSAL), even with constrained annotation budgets. Our code is available at [RDSS](https://github.com/YanhuiAILab/RDSS). Qian Shao, Jiangrui Kang, Qiyuan Chen 0003, Zepeng Li 0002, Yiwen Cao, Jiajuan Liang, Jian Wu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 7 |