Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiaang Li 0002

dblp:340/3968-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-5656-6204ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Vision and language · 60% Language models and text generation · 40%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.812024
Understanding Retrieval Robustness for Retrieval-augmented Image Captioning · ACL (1) 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal understanding
0.812024
FoodieQA: A Multimodal Dataset for Fine-Grained Understanding of Chinese Food Culture · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning › neural image captioning
retrieval-augmented image captioning
0.812024
Understanding Retrieval Robustness for Retrieval-augmented Image Captioning · ACL (1) 2024
Information retrieval › trustworthy information retrieval
retrieval robustness
0.812024
Understanding Retrieval Robustness for Retrieval-augmented Image Captioning · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models › memorization
memorization in language models
0.712023
Copyright Violations and Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models › memorization
verbatim memorization
0.712023
Copyright Violations and Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.212024
FoodieQA: A Multimodal Dataset for Fine-Grained Understanding of Chinese Food Culture · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

input attribution · 1.5diverse retrieval sampling · 1.5language model prompting · 1.3vision-language model · 0.8multimodal dataset construction · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Understanding Retrieval Robustness for Retrieval-augmented Image Captioning
abstract
Recent advances in retrieval-augmented models for image captioning highlight the benefit of retrieving related captions for efficient, lightweight models with strong domain-transfer capabilities.While these models demonstrate the success of retrieval augmentation, retrieval models are still far from perfect in practice: the retrieved information can sometimes mislead the model, resulting in incorrect generation and worse performance.In this paper, we analyze the robustness of a retrieval-augmented captioning model SMALLCAP.Our analysis shows that the model is sensitive to tokens that appear in the majority of the retrieved captions, and the input attribution shows that those tokens are likely copied into the generated output.Given these findings, we propose to train the model by sampling retrieved captions from more diverse sets.This decreases the chance that the model learns to copy majority tokens, and improves both in-domain and cross-domain performance.
Wenyan Li 0001, Jiaang Li 0002, Rita Ramos, Raphael Tang, Desmond Elliott
ACL (1)2
2024 FoodieQA: A Multimodal Dataset for Fine-Grained Understanding of Chinese Food Culture
abstract
Wenyan Li, Crystina Zhang, Jiaang Li, Qiwei Peng, Raphael Tang, Li Zhou, Weijia Zhang, Guimin Hu, Yifei Yuan, Anders Søgaard, Daniel Hershcovich, Desmond Elliott. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Wenyan Li 0001, Xinyu Zhang 0018, Jiaang Li 0002, Qiwei Peng 0003, Raphael Tang, Li Zhou 0010, Weijia Zhang 0004, Guimin Hu, Yifei Yuan 0002, Anders Søgaard, Daniel Hershcovich, Desmond Elliott
EMNLP3
2024 Is word order considered by foundation models? A comparative task-oriented analysis
Jiaang Li 0002, Zhongfeng Kang, Zenghui Zhou
Expert Syst. Appl.2
2024 Do Vision and Language Models Share Concepts? A Vector Space Alignment Study
abstract
Abstract Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) are said to “lack the ability to connect utterances to the world” (Bender and Koller, 2020), because they do not have “mental models of the world” (Mitchell and Krakauer, 2023). If so, one would expect LM representations to be unrelated to representations induced by vision models. We present an empirical evaluation across four families of LMs (BERT, GPT-2, OPT, and LLaMA-2) and three vision model architectures (ResNet, SegFormer, and MAE). Our experiments show that LMs partially converge towards representations isomorphic to those of vision models, subject to dispersion, polysemy, and frequency. This has important implications for both multi-modal processing and the LM understanding debate (Mitchell and Krakauer, 2023).1
Jiaang Li 0002, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Constanza Fierro, Anders Søgaard
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics1
2023 Copyright Violations and Large Language Models
abstract
Language models may memorize more than just facts, including entire chunks of texts seen during training.Fair use exemptions to copyright laws typically allow for limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder, but typically for extraction of information from copyrighted materials, rather than verbatim reproduction.This work explores the issue of copyright violations and large language models through the lens of verbatim memorization, focusing on possible redistribution of copyrighted text.We present experiments with a range of language models over a collection of popular books and coding problems, providing a conservative characterization of the extent to which language models can redistribute these materials.Overall, this research highlights the need for further examination and the potential impact on future developments in natural language processing to ensure adherence to copyright regulations.
Antonia Karamolegkou, Jiaang Li 0002, Li Zhou 0010, Anders Søgaard
EMNLP2