Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohsen Dehghankar

dblp:341/3995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-1687-8012ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational geometry · 43% Computational complexity · 38% Approximation and online algorithms · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 56% Information retrieval · 44%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 81% Language models and text generation · 19%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry
epsilon-net
1.012026
On Fair Epsilon Net and Geometric Hitting Set · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Computational geometry › combinatorial geometry › geometric set systems
geometric hitting set
1.012026
On Fair Epsilon Net and Geometric Hitting Set · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
Mining the Minoria: Unknown, Under-represented, and Under-performing Minority Groups · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Information retrieval
ranking
0.912025
Rank It, Then Ask It: Input Reranking for Maximizing the Performance of LLMs on Symmetric Tasks · KDD (2) 2025
Data mining › pattern mining
subgroup discovery
0.912025
Mining the Minoria: Unknown, Under-represented, and Under-performing Minority Groups · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
neural network accelerator
0.912025
An Efficient Matrix Multiplication Algorithm for Accelerating Inference in Binary and Ternary Neural Networks · ICML 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › DNN inference
quantized inference
0.912025
An Efficient Matrix Multiplication Algorithm for Accelerating Inference in Binary and Ternary Neural Networks · ICML 2025
Computational complexity › algebraic complexity › matrix multiplication
fast matrix multiplication
0.912025
An Efficient Matrix Multiplication Algorithm for Accelerating Inference in Binary and Ternary Neural Networks · ICML 2025
Computational complexity › algebraic complexity
matrix multiplication
0.912025
An Efficient Matrix Multiplication Algorithm for Accelerating Inference in Binary and Ternary Neural Networks · ICML 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
set cover
0.912025
Fair Set Cover · KDD (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
algorithmic fairness
0.312025
Fair Set Cover · KDD (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting
0.312025
Rank It, Then Ask It: Input Reranking for Maximizing the Performance of LLMs on Symmetric Tasks · KDD (2) 2025
Data mining
pattern mining
0.312025
Mining the Minoria: Unknown, Under-represented, and Under-performing Minority Groups · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7hyperplane arrangement · 1.7approximation algorithm · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Dynamic Necklace Splitting
abstract
The necklace splitting problem is a classic problem in fair division with many applications, including data-informed fair hash maps. We extend necklace splitting to a dynamic setting, allowing for relocation, insertion, and deletion of beads. We present linear-time, optimal algorithms for the two-color case that support all dynamic updates. For more than two colors, we give linear-time, optimal algorithms for relocation subject to a restriction on the number of agents. Finally, we propose a randomized algorithm for the two-color case that handles all dynamic updates, guarantees approximate fairness with high probability, and runs in polylogarithmic time when the number of agents is small.
Rishi Advani, Abolfazl Asudeh, Mohsen Dehghankar, Stavros Sintos
ICDT3
2026 On Fair Epsilon Net and Geometric Hitting Set
Mohsen Dehghankar, Stavros Sintos, Abolfazl Asudeh
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2025 An Efficient Matrix Multiplication Algorithm for Accelerating Inference in Binary and Ternary Neural Networks
abstract
Despite their tremendous success and versatility, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) such as Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from inference inefficiency and rely on advanced computational infrastructure. To address these challenges and make these models more accessible and cost-effective, in this paper, we propose algorithms to improve the inference time and memory efficiency of DNNs with binary and ternary weight matrices. Particularly focusing on matrix multiplication as the bottleneck operation of inference, we observe that, once trained, the weight matrices of a model no longer change. This allows us to preprocess these matrices and create indices that help reduce the storage requirements by a logarithmic factor while enabling our efficient inference algorithms. Specifically, for a $n\times n$ weight matrix, our efficient algorithm guarantees a time complexity of $O(\frac{n^2}{\log n})$, a logarithmic factor improvement over the standard vector-matrix multiplication. Besides theoretical analysis, we conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the practical efficiency of our algorithms. Our results confirm the superiority of our approach both with respect to time and memory, as we observed a reduction in the multiplication time up to 29x and memory usage up to 6x. When applied to LLMs, our experiments show up to a 5.24x speedup in the inference time.
Mohsen Dehghankar, Mahdi Erfanian, Abolfazl Asudeh
ICML1
2025 Rank It, Then Ask It: Input Reranking for Maximizing the Performance of LLMs on Symmetric Tasks
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have quickly emerged as practical and versatile tools that provide new solutions for a wide range of domains. In this paper, we consider the application of LLMs on symmetric tasks where a query is asked on an (unordered) bag of elements. Examples of such tasks include answering aggregate queries on a dataset. In general, when the bag contains a large number of elements, LLMs tend to overlook some elements, leading to challenges in generating accurate responses to the query. LLMs receive their inputs as ordered sequences. On the other hand, the input of a symmetric task is not ordered; hence reordering should not affect the LLM's response. Observing that LLMs are less likely to miss elements at certain positions of the input, we introduce the problem of LLM input reranking: to find a ranking of the input that maximizes the LLM's accuracy for the given query without making explicit assumptions about the query. Finding the optimal ranking requires identifying (i) the relevance of each input element for answering the query and (ii) the importance of each rank position for the LLM's attention. We develop algorithms for estimating these values efficiently utilizing a helper LLM. We conduct comprehensive experiments on different synthetic and real datasets to validate our proposal and to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms. Our experiments confirm that our reranking approach improves the accuracy of the LLMs on symmetric tasks by up to 99% proximity to the optimum upper bound.
Mohsen Dehghankar, Abolfazl Asudeh
KDD (2)1
2025 Fair Set Cover
abstract
The potential harms of algorithmic decisions have ignited algorithmic fairness as a central topic in computer science. One of the fundamental problems in computer science is Set Cover, which has numerous applications with societal impacts, such as assembling a small team of individuals that collectively satisfy a range of expertise requirements. However, despite its broad application spectrum and significant potential impact, set cover has yet to be studied through the lens of fairness.
Mohsen Dehghankar, Rahul Raychaudhury, Stavros Sintos, Abolfazl Asudeh
KDD (1)1
2025 Mining the Minoria: Unknown, Under-represented, and Under-performing Minority Groups
abstract
Due to a variety of reasons, such as privacy, data in the wild often misses the grouping information required for identifying minorities. On the other hand, it is known that machine learning models are only as good as the data they are trained on and, hence, may underperform for the under-represented minority groups. The missing grouping information presents a dilemma for responsible data scientists who find themselves in an unknown-unknown situation, where not only do they not have access to the grouping attributes but do not also know what groups to consider. This paper is an attempt to address this dilemma. Specifically, we propose a minority mining problem, where we find vectors in the attribute space that reveal potential groups that are under-represented and under-performing. Technically speaking, we propose a geometric transformation of data into a dual space and use notions such as the arrangement of hyperplanes to design an efficient algorithm for the problem in lower dimensions. Generalizing our solution to the higher dimensions is cursed by dimensionality. Therefore, we propose a solution based on smart exploration of the search space for such cases. We conduct comprehensive experiments using real-world and synthetic datasets alongside the theoretical analysis. Our experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed solutions in mining the unknown, under-represented, and under-performing minorities.
Mohsen Dehghankar, Abolfazl Asudeh
Proc. VLDB Endow.1