Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Glickman
dblp:341/5528
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
attribute binding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map Alignment · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
syntactic analysis · 0.7cross-attention loss optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map AlignmentabstractText-conditioned image generation models often generate incorrect associations between entities and their visual attributes. This reflects an impaired mapping between linguistic binding of entities and modifiers in the prompt and visual binding of the corresponding elements in the generated image. As one example, a query like ``a pink sunflower and a yellow flamingo'' may incorrectly produce an image of a yellow sunflower and a pink flamingo. To remedy this issue, we propose SynGen, an approach which first syntactically analyses the prompt to identify entities and their modifiers, and then uses a novel loss function that encourages the cross-attention maps to agree with the linguistic binding reflected by the syntax. Specifically, we encourage large overlap between attention maps of entities and their modifiers, and small overlap with other entities and modifier words. The loss is optimized during inference, without retraining or fine-tuning the model. Human evaluation on three datasets, including one new and challenging set, demonstrate significant improvements of SynGen compared with current state of the art methods. This work highlights how making use of sentence structure during inference can efficiently and substantially improve the faithfulness of text-to-image generation. Royi Rassin, Eran Hirsch, Daniel Glickman, Shauli Ravfogel, Yoav Goldberg, Gal Chechik |
NeurIPS | 3 |