Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianqi Du
dblp:341/5548
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 40% Language models and text generation · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
2.0 | 3 | 2023 | ArCL: Enhancing Contrastive Learning with Augmentation-Robust Representations · ICLR 2023 ContraNorm: A Contrastive Learning Perspective on Oversmoothing and Beyond · ICLR 2023 A Message Passing Perspective on Learning Dynamics of Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM Decoding · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › compositional generalization
length generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Long-Short Alignment for Effective Long-Context Modeling in LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization
long-context modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Long-Short Alignment for Effective Long-Context Modeling in LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
reranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM Decoding · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
training regularization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Long-Short Alignment for Effective Long-Context Modeling in LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM Decoding · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
autoregressive pre-training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Look Ahead or Look Around? A Theoretical Comparison Between Autoregressive and Masked Pretraining · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › discrete representation learning
discrete tokenization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Role of Discrete Tokenization in Visual Representation Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
generative self-supervised learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Look Ahead or Look Around? A Theoretical Comparison Between Autoregressive and Masked Pretraining · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked image modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Role of Discrete Tokenization in Visual Representation Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
masked pre-training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Look Ahead or Look Around? A Theoretical Comparison Between Autoregressive and Masked Pretraining · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › robust representation learning
contrastive learning robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ArCL: Enhancing Contrastive Learning with Augmentation-Robust Representations · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ArCL: Enhancing Contrastive Learning with Augmentation-Robust Representations · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
learning dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Message Passing Perspective on Learning Dynamics of Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ContraNorm: A Contrastive Learning Perspective on Oversmoothing and Beyond · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ContraNorm: A Contrastive Learning Perspective on Oversmoothing and Beyond · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Role of Discrete Tokenization in Visual Representation Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward model · 1.7lightweight reranking module · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.4regularization · 0.9misalignment metric · 0.9variable-length masked objective · 0.8tokenizer design · 0.8theoretical comparison · 0.8masked image modeling · 0.8diversity-enhanced autoregressive objective · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Long-Short Alignment for Effective Long-Context Modeling in LLMsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive performance and surprising emergent properties. However, their effectiveness remains limited by the fixed context window of the transformer architecture, posing challenges for long-context modeling. Among these challenges, length generalization — the ability to generalize to sequences longer than those seen during training — is a classical and fundamental problem. In this work, we propose a fresh perspective on length generalization, shifting the focus from the conventional emphasis on input features such as positional encodings or data structures to the output distribution of the model. Specifically, through case studies on synthetic tasks, we highlight the critical role of **long-short alignment** — the consistency of output distributions across sequences of varying lengths. Extending this insight to natural language tasks, we propose a metric called Long-Short Misalignment to quantify this phenomenon, uncovering a strong correlation between the metric and length generalization performance. Building on these findings, we develop a regularization term that promotes long-short alignment during training. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering new insights for achieving more effective long-context modeling in LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/PKU-ML/LongShortAlignment. Tianqi Du, Haotian Huang, Yifei Wang 0001, Yisen Wang 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | GCL-CCSE: Empowering Graph Constrastive Learning with Consolidated Community and Subgraph EssentialsabstractAs an emerging self-supervised graph representation learning model, graph contrastive learning has garnered significant attention. These models do not rely on manual annotations but instead leverage unsupervised contrastive learning strategies to maximize the consistency of similar graph or node representations, thereby learning high-quality graph representations. To fully exploit the structural information within graphs, we propose a graph contrastive learning model, GCL-CCSE. The model combines community detection and subgraph auxiliary models to better capture both local and global structural information during the learning process. Specifically, GCL-CCSE not only considers node-level information in the contrastive learning process but also incorporates community and subgraph-level information, avoiding comparisons solely between nodes and the entire graph, thus preserving the uniqueness of node embeddings. The model performs data augmentation through random edge dropping and feature masking, encodes using a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN), and generates positive and negative samples through community partitioning and subgraph sampling. Experiments conducted on four datasets for node classification tasks demonstrate that GCL-CCSE outperforms existing graph representation learning algorithms across multiple metrics. Additionally, ablation experiments verify the contributions of community and subgraph information to model performance, while sensitivity experiments explore the impact of subgraph size and the number of communities on model performance. This research provides new insights into graph contrastive learning and significantly enhances the performance of the model in downstream tasks. Dongqi Wang 0001, Meiwen Tan, Zhicheng Gao, Tianqi Du, Dongming Chen |
IJCNN | 4 |
| 2025 | Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM DecodingabstractConventional research on large language models (LLMs) has primarily focused on refining output distributions, while paying less attention to the decoding process that transforms these distributions into final responses. Recent advances, such as scaling the computation of inference time with reward models, have underscored the importance of decoding, but these methods often suffer from high computational costs and limited applicability.
In this paper, we revisit LLM generation through the lens of recommender systems, conceptualizing the decoding process as analogous to the ranking stage in recommendation pipelines. From this perspective, we observe that both traditional decoding methods and reward models exhibit clear limitations such as redundancy.
Motivated by this insight, we propose Language Ranker, a novel framework that introduces a lightweight module to rerank candidate responses using features extracted by the base model. Experiments across a wide range of tasks show that Language Ranker achieves performance comparable to large-scale reward models, while requiring only <0.5M additional parameters, significantly reducing the computational overhead during both training and inference stages. This highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of our method, showcasing its potential to fully unlock the capabilities of LLMs. Chenheng Zhang, Tianqi Du, Jizhe Zhang, Mingqing Xiao 0002, Yifei Wang 0001, Yisen Wang 0001, Zhouchen Lin |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | On the Role of Discrete Tokenization in Visual Representation LearningabstractIn the realm of self-supervised learning (SSL), masked image modeling (MIM) has gained popularity alongside contrastive learning methods. MIM involves reconstructing masked regions of input images using their unmasked portions. A notable subset of MIM methodologies employs discrete tokens as the reconstruction target, but the theoretical underpinnings of this choice remain underexplored. In this paper, we explore the role of these discrete tokens, aiming to unravel their benefits and limitations. Building upon the connection between MIM and contrastive learning, we provide a comprehensive theoretical understanding on how discrete tokenization affects the model's generalization capabilities. Furthermore, we propose a novel metric named TCAS, which is specifically designed to assess the effectiveness of discrete tokens within the MIM framework. Inspired by this metric, we contribute an innovative tokenizer design and propose a corresponding MIM method named ClusterMIM. It demonstrates superior performance on a variety of benchmark datasets and ViT backbones. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/PKU-ML/ClusterMIM}. Tianqi Du, Yifei Wang 0001, Yisen Wang 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Look Ahead or Look Around? A Theoretical Comparison Between Autoregressive and Masked PretrainingabstractIn recent years, the rise of generative self-supervised learning (SSL) paradigms has exhibited impressive performance across visual, language, and multi-modal domains. While the varied designs of generative SSL objectives lead to distinct properties in downstream tasks, a theoretical understanding of these differences remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we establish the first theoretical comparisons between two leading generative SSL paradigms: autoregressive SSL and masked SSL. Through establishing theoretical frameworks, we elucidate the strengths and limitations of autoregressive and masked SSL within the primary evaluation tasks of classification and content generation. Our findings demonstrate that in classification tasks, the flexibility of targeted tokens in masked SSL fosters more inter-sample connections compared to the fixed position of target tokens in autoregressive SSL, which yields superior clustering performance. In content generation tasks, the misalignment between the flexible lengths of test samples and the fixed length of unmasked texts in masked SSL (vs. flexible lengths of conditional texts in autoregressive SSL) hinders its generation performance. To leverage each other’s strengths and mitigate weaknesses, we propose diversity-enhanced autoregressive and variable-length masked objectives, which substantially improve the classification performance of autoregressive SSL and the generation performance of masked SSL. Code is available at https://github.com/PKU-ML/LookAheadLookAround. Qi Zhang 0067, Tianqi Du, Haotian Huang, Yifei Wang 0001, Yisen Wang 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Adapting Generic Features to A Specific Task: A Large Discrepancy Knowledge Distillation for Image Anomaly Detection
Tianqi Du |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2023 | A Message Passing Perspective on Learning Dynamics of Contrastive Learning
Yifei Wang 0001, Qi Zhang 0067, Tianqi Du, Jiansheng Yang, Zhouchen Lin, Yisen Wang 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | ContraNorm: A Contrastive Learning Perspective on Oversmoothing and Beyond
Yifei Wang 0001, Tianqi Du, Yisen Wang 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | ArCL: Enhancing Contrastive Learning with Augmentation-Robust Representations
Tianqi Du, Yisen Wang 0001, Weiran Huang 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |