Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gaoyi Wu

dblp:341/6094 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 75% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › coding theory
error-correcting codes
1.012026
iSeal: Encrypted Fingerprinting for Reliable LLM Ownership Verification · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection › model ownership verification › model fingerprinting
LLM fingerprinting
1.012026
iSeal: Encrypted Fingerprinting for Reliable LLM Ownership Verification · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning
model intellectual property protection
1.012026
iSeal: Encrypted Fingerprinting for Reliable LLM Ownership Verification · AAAI 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection
model ownership verification
1.012026
iSeal: Encrypted Fingerprinting for Reliable LLM Ownership Verification · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

similarity-based verification · 1.0fingerprint injection · 1.0error correction · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 iSeal: Encrypted Fingerprinting for Reliable LLM Ownership Verification
abstract
Given the high cost of large language model (LLM) training from scratch, safeguarding LLM intellectual property (IP) becomes increasingly crucial. As the standard paradigm for IP ownership verification, LLM fingerprinting thus plays a vital role in addressing this challenge. Existing LLM fingerprinting methods verify ownership by extracting or injecting model-specific features. However, they overlook potential attacks during the verification process, leaving them ineffective when the model thief fully controls the LLM's inference process. In such settings, attackers may share prompt-response pairs to enable fingerprint unlearning, or manipulate outputs to evade exact-match verification. We propose iSeal, the first fingerprinting method designed for reliable verification when the model thief controls the suspected LLM in an end-to-end manner. It injects unique features into both the model and an external module, reinforced by an error-correction mechanism and a similarity-based verification strategy. These components are resistant to verification-time attacks, including collusion-based fingerprint unlearning and response manipulation, backed by both theoretical analysis and empirical results. iSeal achieves 100% Fingerprint Success Rate (FSR) on 12 LLMs against more than 10 attacks, while baselines fail under unlearning and response manipulations.
Zixun Xiong, Gaoyi Wu, Qingyang Yu, Mingyu Derek Ma, Lingfeng Yao, Miao Pan, Xiaojiang Du
AAAI2