Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rainee Pei

dblp:341/9530 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5149-8537ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 56% Health and well-being technologies · 44%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › assistive robotics
cognitively assistive robots
0.712023
Get SMART: Collaborative Goal Setting with Cognitively Assistive Robots · HRI 2023
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation
neurorehabilitation
0.712023
Get SMART: Collaborative Goal Setting with Cognitively Assistive Robots · HRI 2023
Health and well-being technologies
goal setting
0.212023
Get SMART: Collaborative Goal Setting with Cognitively Assistive Robots · HRI 2023
Health and well-being technologies
mild cognitive impairment
0.212023
Get SMART: Collaborative Goal Setting with Cognitively Assistive Robots · HRI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prototyping · 0.7co-design · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Get SMART: Collaborative Goal Setting with Cognitively Assistive Robots
abstract
Many robot-delivered health interventions aim to support people longitudinally at home to complement or replace in-clinic treatments. However, there is little guidance on how robots can support collaborative goal setting (CGS). CGS is the process in which a person works with a clinician to set and modify their goals for care; it can improve treatment adherence and efficacy. However, for home-deployed robots, clinicians will have limited availability to help set and modify goals over time, which necessitates that robots support CGS on their own. In this work, we explore how robots can facilitate CGS in the context of our robot CARMEN (Cognitively Assistive Robot for Motivation and Neurorehabilitation), which delivers neurorehabilitation to people with mild cognitive impairment (PwMCI). We co-designed robot behaviors for supporting CGS with clinical neuropsychologists and PwMCI, and prototyped them on CARMEN. We present feedback on how PwMCI envision these behaviors supporting goal progress and motivation during an intervention. We report insights on how to support this process with home-deployed robots and propose a framework to support HRI researchers interested in exploring this both in the context of cognitively assistive robots and beyond. This work supports designing and implementing CGS on robots, which will ultimately extend the efficacy of robot-delivered health interventions.
Alyssa Kubota, Rainee Pei, Ethan Sun, Dagoberto Cruz-Sandoval, Soyon Kim, Laurel D. Riek
HRI2