Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zach Furman

dblp:342/7253 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Learning theory · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › multi-head attention
attention head specialization
0.912025
Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficient · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficient · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.912025
Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficient · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

singular learning theory · 0.9local learning coefficient · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The Local Learning Coefficient: A Singularity-Aware Complexity Measure
abstract
The Local Learning Coefficient (LLC) is introduced as a novel complexity measure for deep neural networks (DNNs). Recognizing the limitations of traditional complexity measures, the LLC leverages Singular Learning Theory (SLT), which has long recognized the significance of singularities in the loss landscape geometry. This paper provides an extensive exploration of the LLC’s theoretical underpinnings, offering both a clear definition and intuitive insights into its application. Moreover, we propose a new scalable estimator for the LLC, which is then effectively applied across diverse architectures including deep linear networks up to 100M parameters, ResNet image models, and transformer language models. Empirical evidence suggests that the LLC provides valuable insights into how training heuristics might influence the effective complexity of DNNs. Ultimately, the LLC emerges as a crucial tool for reconciling the apparent contradiction between deep learning’s complexity and the principle of parsimony.
Edmund Lau, Zach Furman, George Wang, Daniel Murfet, Susan Wei
AISTATS2
2025 Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficient
abstract
We introduce refined variants of the Local Learning Coefficient (LLC), a measure of model complexity grounded in singular learning theory, to study the development of internal structure in transformer language models during training. By applying these refined LLCs (rLLCs) to individual components of a two-layer attention-only transformer, we gain novel insights into the progressive differentiation and specialization of attention heads. Our methodology reveals how attention heads differentiate into distinct functional roles over the course of training, analyzes the types of data these heads specialize to process, and discovers a previously unidentified multigram circuit. These findings demonstrate that rLLCs provide a principled, quantitative toolkit for developmental interpretability, which aims to understand models through their evolution across the learning process. This work advances the field of developmental interpretability by providing a mathematically rigorous approach to understanding neural networks through the lens of their learning process. More broadly, this work takes a step towards establishing the correspondence between data distributional structure, geometric properties of the loss landscape, learning dynamics, and emergent computational structures in neural networks.
George Wang, Jesse Hoogland, Stan van Wingerden, Zach Furman, Daniel Murfet
ICLR4