Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naga Venkata Sai Jitin Jami

dblp:344/5549 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Segmentation and scene understanding · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity
0.912025
Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image Segmentation · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.912025
Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image Segmentation · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stratified sampling
0.912025
Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image Segmentation · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein distance · 0.9iterative pixel stratification · 0.9genetic algorithm · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image Segmentation
abstract
Random splitting of datasets in image segmentation often leads to unrepresentative test sets, resulting in biased evaluations and poor model generalization. While stratified sampling has proven effective for addressing label distribution imbalance in classification tasks, extending these ideas to segmentation remains challenging due to the multi-label structure and class imbalance typically present in such data. Building on existing stratification concepts, we introduce Iterative Pixel Stratification (IPS), a straightforward, label-aware sampling method tailored for segmentation tasks. Additionally, we present Wasserstein-Driven Evolutionary Stratification (WDES), a novel genetic algorithm designed to minimize the Wasserstein distance, thereby optimizing the similarity of label distributions across dataset splits. We prove that WDES is globally optimal given enough generations. Using newly proposed statistical heterogeneity metrics, we evaluate both methods against random sampling and find that WDES consistently produces more representative splits. Applying WDES across diverse segmentation tasks, including street scenes, medical imaging, and satellite imagery, leads to lower performance variance and improved model evaluation. Our results also highlight the particular value of WDES in handling small, imbalanced, and low-diversity datasets, where conventional splitting strategies are most prone to bias.
Naga Venkata Sai Jitin Jami, Thomas Altstidl, Dario Zanca, Björn M. Eskofier, Heike Leutheuser
NeurIPS1