Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Naga Venkata Sai Jitin Jami
dblp:344/5549
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image Segmentation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image Segmentation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stratified sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image Segmentation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wasserstein distance · 0.9iterative pixel stratification · 0.9genetic algorithm · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Stratify or Die: Rethinking Data Splits in Image SegmentationabstractRandom splitting of datasets in image segmentation often leads to unrepresentative test sets, resulting in biased evaluations and poor model generalization. While stratified sampling has proven effective for addressing label distribution imbalance in classification tasks, extending these ideas to segmentation remains challenging due to the multi-label structure and class imbalance typically present in such data. Building on existing stratification concepts, we introduce Iterative Pixel Stratification (IPS), a straightforward, label-aware sampling method tailored for segmentation tasks. Additionally, we present Wasserstein-Driven Evolutionary Stratification (WDES), a novel genetic algorithm designed to minimize the Wasserstein distance, thereby optimizing the similarity of label distributions across dataset splits. We prove that WDES is globally optimal given enough generations. Using newly proposed statistical heterogeneity metrics, we evaluate both methods against random sampling and find that WDES consistently produces more representative splits. Applying WDES across diverse segmentation tasks, including street scenes, medical imaging, and satellite imagery, leads to lower performance variance and improved model evaluation. Our results also highlight the particular value of WDES in handling small, imbalanced, and low-diversity datasets, where conventional splitting strategies are most prone to bias. Naga Venkata Sai Jitin Jami, Thomas Altstidl, Dario Zanca, Björn M. Eskofier, Heike Leutheuser |
NeurIPS | 1 |