Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mayk Caldas Ramos

dblp:344/7260 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
reasoning model
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › complex reasoning
scientific reasoning
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering
chemistry
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics › molecule generation
molecular structure generation
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.7post-training · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry
abstract
Reasoning models are large language models that use extra "thought tokens" before answering, providing both higher accuracy and explicit reasoning for their response. A major question has been whether language model reasoning generalizes beyond mathematics, programming, and logic, where most previous work has focused. We demonstrate that reasoning models can be post-trained in scientific domains without additional domain pretraining, and require substantially less data compared to contemporary domain-specific models. We report ether0, a 24B parameter LLM (based on Mistral-Small-24B) that can reason in natural language and respond with chemical structures. This reasoning model was trained with reinforcement learning on 577,790 experimentally-grounded chemistry tasks involving synthesized organic molecules. Our model outperforms all previous general-purpose chemistry models, frontier models, and humans, and is more data efficient relative to specialized models. We anticipate that this method can be applied to train highly data-efficient language models specialized for predictive and generative tasks across a wide variety of scientific domains.
Siddharth Narayanan, James D. Braza, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Albert Bou, Geemi P. Wellawatte, Mayk Caldas Ramos, Ludovico Mitchener, Michael Pieler, Samuel G. Rodriques, Andrew D. White
NeurIPS6