Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kai Nham

dblp:344/9463 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8563-4659ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 56% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
assistive technology for transgender people
0.712023
How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design Processes · CHI 2023
Design research and methods
participatory design
0.712023
How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design Processes · CHI 2023
Design research and methods
user-centered design
0.212023
How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design Processes · CHI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 0.7interview study · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design Processes
abstract
Trans technology – technology created to help address challenges that trans people face – is an important area for innovation that can help improve marginalized people’s lives. We conducted 104 interviews with 115 creators of trans technology to understand how they involved trans people and communities in design processes. We describe projects that used human-centered design processes, as well as design processes that involved trans people in smaller ways, including gathering feedback from users, conducting user testing, or the creators being trans themselves. We show how involving trans people and communities in design is vital for trans technologies to realize their potential for addressing trans needs. Yet we highlight a frequent gap between trans technology design and deployment, and discuss ways to bridge this gap. We argue for the importance of involving community in trans technology design to ensure that trans technology achieves its promise of helping address trans needs and challenges.
Oliver L. Haimson, Kai Nham, Hibby Thach, Aloe DeGuia
CHI2