Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kai Nham
dblp:344/9463
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8563-4659ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 56% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
assistive technology for transgender people |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design Processes · CHI 2023 |
Design research and methods
participatory design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design Processes · CHI 2023 |
Design research and methods
user-centered design |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design Processes · CHI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative analysis · 0.7interview study · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design ProcessesabstractTrans technology – technology created to help address challenges that trans people face – is an important area for innovation that can help improve marginalized people’s lives. We conducted 104 interviews with 115 creators of trans technology to understand how they involved trans people and communities in design processes. We describe projects that used human-centered design processes, as well as design processes that involved trans people in smaller ways, including gathering feedback from users, conducting user testing, or the creators being trans themselves. We show how involving trans people and communities in design is vital for trans technologies to realize their potential for addressing trans needs. Yet we highlight a frequent gap between trans technology design and deployment, and discuss ways to bridge this gap. We argue for the importance of involving community in trans technology design to ensure that trans technology achieves its promise of helping address trans needs and challenges. Oliver L. Haimson, Kai Nham, Hibby Thach, Aloe DeGuia |
CHI | 2 |