Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kaleb Kassaw

dblp:345/8462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-8805-7579ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › cross-domain transfer
cross-subject transfer learning
0.912025
Assessing the Impact of Population Data Domain Differences on Transfer Learning in P300-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface
0.312025
Assessing the Impact of Population Data Domain Differences on Transfer Learning in P300-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 1.7EEGNet · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Are deep learning models robust to partial object occlusion in visual recognition tasks?
Kaleb Kassaw, Francesco Luzi, Leslie M. Collins, Jordan M. Malof
Pattern Recognit.1
2025 Assessing the Impact of Population Data Domain Differences on Transfer Learning in P300-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (Student Abstract)
abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can provide a means of communication for individuals with severe neuromuscular diseases, the target end-users. While personalized BCI machine learning models are the current standard, models trained on data from other users could reduce BCI calibration time. We use a novel dataset with BCI users with and without amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and a popular BCI deep learning model, EEGNet, to assess the impact of population domain data on transfer learning of a P300 speller task in the ALS cohort. Results show that training on source data from the non-ALS cohort was detrimental to transfer learning. In contrast, generic EEGNet models trained on source data from the ALS cohort performed comparably as user-specific models. Our findings highlight the need for more data from target end-users populations in publicly available BCI datasets.
Rally Lin, Christina Mo, Reyan Shariff, Darrick Zhang, Abdullah Alumar, Kaleb Kassaw, Leslie M. Collins, Boyla Mainsah
AAAI6
2024 Segment anything, from space?
abstract
Recently, the first foundation model developed specifically for image segmentation tasks was developed, termed the "Segment Anything Model" (SAM). SAM can segment objects in input imagery based on cheap input prompts, such as one (or more) points, a bounding box, or a mask. The authors examined the zero-shot image segmentation accuracy of SAM on a large number of vision benchmark tasks and found that SAM usually achieved recognition accuracy similar to, or sometimes exceeding, vision models that had been trained on the target tasks. The impressive generalization of SAM for segmentation has major implications for vision researchers working on natural imagery. In this work, we examine whether SAM’s performance extends to overhead imagery problems and help guide the community’s response to its development. We examine SAM’s performance on a set of diverse and widely studied benchmark tasks. We find that SAM does often generalize well to overhead imagery, although it fails in some cases due to the unique characteristics of overhead imagery and its common target objects. We report on these unique systematic failure cases for remote sensing imagery that may comprise useful future research for the community.
Simiao Ren, Francesco Luzi, Saad Lahrichi, Kaleb Kassaw, Leslie M. Collins, Kyle Bradbury, Jordan M. Malof
WACV4