Modern neural-network-based Image Quality Assessment (IQA) metrics are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which can be exploited to manipulate search engine rankings, benchmark results, and content quality assessments, raising concerns about the reliability of IQA metrics in critical applications. This paper presents the first comprehensive study of IQA defense mechanisms in response to adversarial attacks on these metrics to pave the way for safer use of IQA metrics. We systematically evaluated 30 defense strategies, including purification, training-based, and certified methods --- and applied 14 adversarial attacks in adaptive and non-adaptive settings to compare these defenses on 9 no-reference IQA metrics. Our proposed benchmark aims to guide the development of IQA defense methods and is open to submissions; the latest results and code are at https://msu-video-group.github.io/adversarial-defenses-for-iqa/.

We propose the LEHA-CVQAD (Large-scale Enriched Human Annotated) dataset, which comprises 6,240 clips for compression-oriented video quality assessment. 59 source videos are encoded with 186 codec-preset variants, ≈1.8M pairwise, and ≈1.5k MOS ratings are fused into a single quality scale; part of the videos remains hidden for blind evaluation. We also propose Rate-Distortion Alignment Error (RDAE), a novel evaluation metric that quantifies how well VQA models preserve bitrate-quality ordering, directly supporting codec parameter tuning. Testing IQA/VQA methods reveals that popular VQA metrics exhibit high RDAE and lower correlations, underscoring the dataset's challenges and utility. The open part and the results of LEHA-CVQAD are available at https://aleksandrgushchin.github.io/lcvqad/

Nowadays, neural-network-based image- and video-quality metrics perform better than traditional methods. However, they also became more vulnerable to adversarial attacks that increase metrics' scores without improving visual quality. The existing benchmarks of quality metrics compare their performance in terms of correlation with subjective quality and calculation time. Nonetheless, the adversarial robustness of image-quality metrics is also an area worth researching. This paper analyses modern metrics' robustness to different adversarial attacks. We adapted adversarial attacks from computer vision tasks and compared attacks' efficiency against 15 no-reference image- and video-quality metrics. Some metrics showed high resistance to adversarial attacks, which makes their usage in benchmarks safer than vulnerable metrics. The benchmark accepts submissions of new metrics for researchers who want to make their metrics more robust to attacks or to find such metrics for their needs. The latest results can be found online: https://videoprocessing.ai/benchmarks/metrics-robustness.html.

Video-quality measurement is a critical task in video processing. Nowadays, many implementations of new encoding standards - such as AV1, VVC, and LCEVC - use deep-learning-based decoding algorithms with perceptual metrics that serve as optimization objectives. But investigations of the performance of modern video- and image-quality metrics commonly employ videos compressed using older standards, such as AVC. In this paper, we present a new benchmark for video-quality metrics that evaluates video compression. It is based on a new dataset consisting of about 2,500 streams encoded using different standards, including AVC, HEVC, AV1, VP9, and VVC. Subjective scores were collected using crowdsourced pairwise comparisons. The list of evaluated metrics includes recent ones based on machine learning and neural networks. The results demonstrate that new no-reference metrics exhibit high correlation with subjective quality and approach the capability of top full-reference metrics.