Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas Galbraith
dblp:346/5593
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6751-4506ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 46% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
covariate shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Classification Tree Pruning Under Covariate Shift · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Classification Tree Pruning Under Covariate Shift · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree learning
decision tree pruning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Classification Tree Pruning Under Covariate Shift · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Classification Tree Pruning Under Covariate Shift · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
bias-variance tradeoff |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Classification Tree Pruning Under Covariate Shift · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
discrepancy measure · 0.8cross-validation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Classification Tree Pruning Under Covariate ShiftabstractWe consider the problem of pruning a classification tree, that is, selecting a suitable subtree that balances bias and variance, in common situations with inhomogeneous training data. Namely, assuming access to mostly data from a distribution$P_{X, Y}$, but little data from a desired distribution$Q_{X, Y}$with different$X$-marginals, we present the first efficient procedure for optimal pruning in such situations, when cross-validation and other penalized variants are grossly inadequate. Optimality is derived with respect to a notion of average discrepancy$P_{X} \to Q_{X}$(averaged over$X$space) which significantly relaxes a recent notion—termed transfer-exponent—shown to tightly capture the limits of classification under such a distribution shift. Our relaxed notion can be viewed as a measure of relative dimension between distributions, as it relates to existing notions of information such as the Minkowski and Renyi dimensions. Nicholas Galbraith, Samory Kpotufe |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |