Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tiezheng Zhang

dblp:347/8124 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-9988-148XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Vision and language · 48% Generative modeling · 29% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 15%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Vision‑Language‑Vision Auto‑Encoder: Scalable Knowledge Distillation from Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Spatial457: A Diagnostic Benchmark for 6D Spatial Reasoning of Large Mutimodal Models · CVPR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.912025
Spatial457: A Diagnostic Benchmark for 6D Spatial Reasoning of Large Mutimodal Models · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
spatial reasoning benchmark
0.912025
Spatial457: A Diagnostic Benchmark for 6D Spatial Reasoning of Large Mutimodal Models · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.912025
Vision‑Language‑Vision Auto‑Encoder: Scalable Knowledge Distillation from Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Vision‑Language‑Vision Auto‑Encoder: Scalable Knowledge Distillation from Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.712023
AbdomenAtlas-8K: Annotating 8, 000 CT Volumes for Multi-Organ Segmentation in Three Weeks · NeurIPS 2023
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation
organ segmentation
0.712023
AbdomenAtlas-8K: Annotating 8, 000 CT Volumes for Multi-Organ Segmentation in Three Weeks · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.312025
Spatial457: A Diagnostic Benchmark for 6D Spatial Reasoning of Large Mutimodal Models · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.312025
Vision‑Language‑Vision Auto‑Encoder: Scalable Knowledge Distillation from Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › medical image segmentation
multi-organ segmentation
0.212023
AbdomenAtlas-8K: Annotating 8, 000 CT Volumes for Multi-Organ Segmentation in Three Weeks · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

label bias reduction · 1.3error detection · 1.3attention guidance · 1.3active learning · 1.3relative performance dropping rate · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9continuous embeddings · 0.9cascading evaluation · 0.9autoencoder · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Spatial457: A Diagnostic Benchmark for 6D Spatial Reasoning of Large Mutimodal Models
abstract
Although large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in visual scene interpretation and reasoning, their capacity for complex and precise 3-dimensional spatial reasoning remains uncertain. Existing benchmarks focus predominantly on 2D spatial understanding and lack a framework to comprehensively evaluate 6D spatial reasoning across varying complexities. To address this limitation, we present Spatial457, a scalable and unbiased synthetic dataset designed with 4 key capability for spatial reasoning: multi-object recognition, 2D location, 3D location, and 3D orientation. We develop a cascading evaluation structure, constructing 7 question types across 5 difficulty levels that range from basic single object recognition to our new proposed complex 6D spatial reasoning tasks. We evaluated various large multimodal models (LMMs) on Spatial457, observing a general decline in performance as task complexity increases, particularly in 3D reasoning and 6D spatial tasks. To quantify these challenges, we introduce the Relative Performance Dropping Rate (RPDR), highlighting key weaknesses in 3D reasoning capabilities. Leveraging the unbiased attribute design of our dataset, we also uncover prediction biases across different attributes, with similar patterns observed in real-world image settings.1The code is released in https://github.com/XingruiWang/Spatial457.
Xingrui Wang, Wufei Ma, Tiezheng Zhang, Celso de Melo, Jieneng Chen, Alan L. Yuille
CVPR3
2025 Vision‑Language‑Vision Auto‑Encoder: Scalable Knowledge Distillation from Diffusion Models
abstract
Building state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with strong captioning capabilities typically necessitates training on billions of high-quality image-text pairs, requiring millions of GPU hours. This paper introduces the Vision-Language-Vision **(VLV)** auto-encoder framework, which strategically leverages key pretrained components: a vision encoder, the decoder of a Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion model, and subsequently, a Large Language Model (LLM). Specifically, we establish an information bottleneck by regularizing the language representation space, achieved through freezing the pretrained T2I diffusion decoder. Our VLV pipeline effectively distills knowledge from the text-conditioned diffusion model using continuous embeddings, demonstrating comprehensive semantic understanding via high-quality reconstructions. Furthermore, by fine-tuning a pretrained LLM to decode the intermediate language representations into detailed descriptions, we construct a state-of-the-art (SoTA) captioner comparable to leading models like GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash. Our method demonstrates exceptional cost-efficiency and significantly reduces data requirements; by primarily utilizing single-modal images for training and maximizing the utility of existing pretrained models (image encoder, T2I diffusion model, and LLM), it circumvents the need for massive paired image-text datasets, keeping the total training expenditure under $1,000 USD.
Tiezheng Zhang, Yu-Cheng Chou, Jieneng Chen, Alan L. Yuille, Junfei Xiao
NeurIPS1
2024 AbdomenAtlas: A large-scale, detailed-annotated, & multi-center dataset for efficient transfer learning and open algorithmic benchmarking
Chongyu Qu, Xiaoxi Chen, Pedro R. A. S. Bassi, Yijia Shi, Yuxiang Lai, Qian Yu 0012, Huimin Xue, Yixiong Chen, Xiaorui Lin, Yutong Tang, Yining Cao, Haoqi Han, Tiezheng Zhang, Yujiu Ma, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou
Medical Image Anal.16
2023 AbdomenAtlas-8K: Annotating 8, 000 CT Volumes for Multi-Organ Segmentation in Three Weeks
abstract
Annotating medical images, particularly for organ segmentation, is laborious and time-consuming. For example, annotating an abdominal organ requires an estimated rate of 30-60 minutes per CT volume based on the expertise of an annotator and the size, visibility, and complexity of the organ. Therefore, publicly available datasets for multi-organ segmentation are often limited in data size and organ diversity. This paper proposes an active learning procedure to expedite the annotation process for organ segmentation and creates the largest multi-organ dataset (by far) with the spleen, liver, kidneys, stomach, gallbladder, pancreas, aorta, and IVC annotated in 8,448 CT volumes, equating to 3.2 million slices. The conventional annotation methods would take an experienced annotator up to 1,600 weeks (or roughly 30.8 years) to complete this task. In contrast, our annotation procedure has accomplished this task in three weeks (based on an 8-hour workday, five days a week) while maintaining a similar or even better annotation quality. This achievement is attributed to three unique properties of our method: (1) label bias reduction using multiple pre-trained segmentation models, (2) effective error detection in the model predictions, and (3) attention guidance for annotators to make corrections on the most salient errors. Furthermore, we summarize the taxonomy of common errors made by AI algorithms and annotators. This allows for continuous improvement of AI and annotations, significantly reducing the annotation costs required to create large-scale datasets for a wider variety of medical imaging tasks. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/MrGiovanni/AbdomenAtlas
Chongyu Qu, Tiezheng Zhang, Hualin Qiao, Jie Liu 0044, Yucheng Tang, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou
NeurIPS2