Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher G. Bennett

dblp:347/9599 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-3329-2567ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
sequencing quality control
0.612022
SeqWho: reliable, rapid determination of sequence file identity using k-mer frequencies in Random Forest classifiers · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 0.6k-mer frequency analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 SeqWho: reliable, rapid determination of sequence file identity using k-mer frequencies in Random Forest classifiers
abstract
MOTIVATION: With the vast improvements in sequencing technologies and increased number of protocols, sequencing is being used to answer complex biological problems. Subsequently, analysis pipelines have become more time consuming and complicated, usually requiring highly extensive prevalidation steps. Here, we present SeqWho, a program designed to assess heuristically the quality of sequencing files and reliably classify the organism and protocol type by using Random Forest classifiers trained on biases native in k-mer frequencies and repeat sequence identities. RESULTS: Using one of our primary models, we show that our method accurately and rapidly classifies human and mouse sequences from nine different sequencing libraries by species, library and both together, 98.32%, 97.86% and 96.38% of the time, respectively. Ultimately, we demonstrate that SeqWho is a powerful method for reliably validating the quality and identity of the sequencing files used in any pipeline. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/DaehwanKimLab/seqwho. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Christopher G. Bennett, Micah Thornton, Chanhee Park, Gervaise Henry, Venkat S. Malladi
Bioinform.1