Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thea Brüsch
dblp:348/6810
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | REPEAT: Improving Uncertainty Estimation in Representation Learning Explainability · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
interpretable representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | REPEAT: Improving Uncertainty Estimation in Representation Learning Explainability · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | REPEAT: Improving Uncertainty Estimation in Representation Learning Explainability · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic importance estimation · 0.9bernoulli random variable modeling · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | REPEAT: Improving Uncertainty Estimation in Representation Learning ExplainabilityabstractIncorporating uncertainty is crucial to provide trustworthy explanations of deep learning models. Recent works have demonstrated how uncertainty modeling can be particularly important in the unsupervised field of representation learning explainable artificial intelligence (R-XAI). Current R-XAI methods provide uncertainty by measuring variability in the importance score. However, they fail to provide meaningful estimates of whether a pixel is certainly important or not. In this work, we propose a new R-XAI method called REPEAT that addresses the key question of whether or not a pixel is certainly important. REPEAT leverages the stochasticity of current R-XAI methods to produce multiple estimates of importance, thus considering each pixel in an image as a Bernoulli random variable that is either important or unimportant. From these Bernoulli random variables we can directly estimate the importance of a pixel and its associated certainty, thus enabling users to determine certainty in pixel importance. Our extensive evaluation shows that REPEAT gives certainty estimates that are more intuitive, better at detecting out-of-distribution data, and more concise. Kristoffer Wickstrøm, Thea Brüsch, Michael Kampffmeyer, Robert Jenssen |
AAAI | 2 |