Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benedict Schlüter

dblp:348/6844 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-5151-7789ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
6 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 74% Systems and software security · 18% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 8%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 48% Memory systems · 33% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 19%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
4.562026
BreakFAST: Confused Deputy Attack on Infinity Fabric to Break AMD SEV-SNP · SP 2026
Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
confidential computing
1.722025
Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
AMD SEV-SNP
1.012026
BreakFAST: Confused Deputy Attack on Infinity Fabric to Break AMD SEV-SNP · SP 2026
Hardware security and side channels
attestation
0.912025
RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic models
chosen-plaintext attack
0.912025
Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
accelerator security
0.812024
ACAI: Protecting Accelerator Execution with Arm Confidential Computing Architecture · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Memory systems
memory encryption
0.312025
Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
Memory systems
memory protection
0.312025
RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025
Systems and software security
virtualization security
0.212024
HECKLER: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious Interrupts · USENIX Security Symposium 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

confidential computing · 1.5Arm CCA · 1.5malicious interrupts · 0.8fault injection · 0.8exploit construction · 0.8VM isolation breaking · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 BreakFAST: Confused Deputy Attack on Infinity Fabric to Break AMD SEV-SNP
Philipp Giersfeld, Benedict Schlüter, Shweta Shinde
SP2
2025 Sigy: Breaking Intel SGX Enclaves with Malicious Exceptions & Signals
Supraja Sridhara, Andrin Bertschi, Benedict Schlüter, Shweta Shinde
AsiaCCS3
2025 RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP
abstract
AMD SEV-SNP offers confidential computing in form of confidential VMs, such that the untrusted hypervisor cannot tamper with its confidentiality and integrity. SEV-SNP, the latest addition, ensures integrity via the Reverse Map Table (RMP) that stops the hypervisor from tampering guest page mappings. AMD uses RMP entries to protect the rest of the RMP, thus causing a Catch-22 during the RMP setup phase. To address this, SEV-SNP relies on AMD's Platform Security Processor (PSP), that resides next to the x86 cores executing SEV-SNP VMs, to perform the RMP initialization. During initialization, only PSP should be able to alter the RMP memory. All other memory accesses must be fenced, especially from the x86 cores. We present RMPocalypse, a novel attack that shows a critical gap in the security of RMP initialization, wherein the x86 cores maliciously control parts of the initial RMP state. Our analysis shows that the vulnerability arises due to the complex, but insufficient, interplay of multiple hardware components and distributed access controls. To show the impact of our finding, we exploit this gap to break confidentiality and integrity guarantees of SEV-SNP. We demonstrate RMPocalypse by enabling debug on production-mode CVMs, faking attestation, VMSA state replay, and code injection.
Benedict Schlüter, Shweta Shinde
CCS1
2025 Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP
abstract
Confidential computing needs hardware support that stops privileged software from learning secrets of a guest virtual machine. AMD offers such hardware support in the form of SEV-SNP to create confidential virtual machines, such that hardware encrypts all the VM memory. Specifically, SEV-SNP uses the XEX encryption mode with address-dependent tweak values such that the same plaintext at different memory addresses yields different ciphertexts.
Benedict Schlüter, Christoph Wech, Shweta Shinde
CCS1
2024 WeSee: Using Malicious #VC Interrupts to Break AMD SEV-SNP
abstract
AMD SEV-SNP offers VM-level trusted execution environments (TEEs) to protect the confidentiality and integrity for sensitive cloud workloads from untrusted hypervisor controlled by the cloud provider. AMD introduced a new exception, #VC, to facilitate the communication between the VM and the untrusted hypervisor. We present WeSee attack, where the hypervisor injects malicious #VC into a victim VM’s CPU to compromise the security guarantees of AMD SEV-SNP. Specifically, WeSee injects interrupt number 29, which delivers a #VC exception to the VM who then executes the corresponding handler that performs data and register copies between the VM and the hypervisor. WeSee shows that using well-crafted #VC injections, the attacker can induce arbitrary behavior in the VM. Our case-studies demonstrate that WeSee can leak sensitive VM information (kTLS keys for NGINX), corrupt kernel data (firewall rules), and inject arbitrary code (launch a root shell from the kernel space).
Benedict Schlüter, Supraja Sridhara, Andrin Bertschi, Shweta Shinde
SP1
2024 HECKLER: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious Interrupts
Benedict Schlüter, Supraja Sridhara, Mark Kuhne, Andrin Bertschi, Shweta Shinde
USENIX Security Symposium1
2024 ACAI: Protecting Accelerator Execution with Arm Confidential Computing Architecture
Supraja Sridhara, Andrin Bertschi, Benedict Schlüter, Mark Kuhne, Fabio Aliberti, Shweta Shinde
USENIX Security Symposium3