Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benedict Schlüter
dblp:348/6844
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-5151-7789ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 7 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
6 papers |
Hardware security and side channels · 74% Systems and software security · 18% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 8% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 48% Memory systems · 33% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 19% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
4.5 | 6 | 2026 | BreakFAST: Confused Deputy Attack on Infinity Fabric to Break AMD SEV-SNP · SP 2026 Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
confidential computing |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
AMD SEV-SNP |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BreakFAST: Confused Deputy Attack on Infinity Fabric to Break AMD SEV-SNP · SP 2026 |
Hardware security and side channels
attestation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic models
chosen-plaintext attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
accelerator security |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ACAI: Protecting Accelerator Execution with Arm Confidential Computing Architecture · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Memory systems
memory encryption |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 |
Memory systems
memory protection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNP · CCS 2025 |
Systems and software security
virtualization security |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | HECKLER: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious Interrupts · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
confidential computing · 1.5Arm CCA · 1.5malicious interrupts · 0.8fault injection · 0.8exploit construction · 0.8VM isolation breaking · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | BreakFAST: Confused Deputy Attack on Infinity Fabric to Break AMD SEV-SNP
Philipp Giersfeld, Benedict Schlüter, Shweta Shinde |
SP | 2 |
| 2025 | Sigy: Breaking Intel SGX Enclaves with Malicious Exceptions & Signals
Supraja Sridhara, Andrin Bertschi, Benedict Schlüter, Shweta Shinde |
AsiaCCS | 3 |
| 2025 | RMPocalypse: How a Catch-22 Breaks AMD SEV-SNPabstractAMD SEV-SNP offers confidential computing in form of confidential VMs, such that the untrusted hypervisor cannot tamper with its confidentiality and integrity. SEV-SNP, the latest addition, ensures integrity via the Reverse Map Table (RMP) that stops the hypervisor from tampering guest page mappings. AMD uses RMP entries to protect the rest of the RMP, thus causing a Catch-22 during the RMP setup phase. To address this, SEV-SNP relies on AMD's Platform Security Processor (PSP), that resides next to the x86 cores executing SEV-SNP VMs, to perform the RMP initialization. During initialization, only PSP should be able to alter the RMP memory. All other memory accesses must be fenced, especially from the x86 cores. We present RMPocalypse, a novel attack that shows a critical gap in the security of RMP initialization, wherein the x86 cores maliciously control parts of the initial RMP state. Our analysis shows that the vulnerability arises due to the complex, but insufficient, interplay of multiple hardware components and distributed access controls. To show the impact of our finding, we exploit this gap to break confidentiality and integrity guarantees of SEV-SNP. We demonstrate RMPocalypse by enabling debug on production-mode CVMs, faking attestation, VMSA state replay, and code injection. Benedict Schlüter, Shweta Shinde |
CCS | 1 |
| 2025 | Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNPabstractConfidential computing needs hardware support that stops privileged software from learning secrets of a guest virtual machine. AMD offers such hardware support in the form of SEV-SNP to create confidential virtual machines, such that hardware encrypts all the VM memory. Specifically, SEV-SNP uses the XEX encryption mode with address-dependent tweak values such that the same plaintext at different memory addresses yields different ciphertexts. Benedict Schlüter, Christoph Wech, Shweta Shinde |
CCS | 1 |
| 2024 | WeSee: Using Malicious #VC Interrupts to Break AMD SEV-SNPabstractAMD SEV-SNP offers VM-level trusted execution environments (TEEs) to protect the confidentiality and integrity for sensitive cloud workloads from untrusted hypervisor controlled by the cloud provider. AMD introduced a new exception, #VC, to facilitate the communication between the VM and the untrusted hypervisor. We present WeSee attack, where the hypervisor injects malicious #VC into a victim VM’s CPU to compromise the security guarantees of AMD SEV-SNP. Specifically, WeSee injects interrupt number 29, which delivers a #VC exception to the VM who then executes the corresponding handler that performs data and register copies between the VM and the hypervisor. WeSee shows that using well-crafted #VC injections, the attacker can induce arbitrary behavior in the VM. Our case-studies demonstrate that WeSee can leak sensitive VM information (kTLS keys for NGINX), corrupt kernel data (firewall rules), and inject arbitrary code (launch a root shell from the kernel space). Benedict Schlüter, Supraja Sridhara, Andrin Bertschi, Shweta Shinde |
SP | 1 |
| 2024 | HECKLER: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious Interrupts
Benedict Schlüter, Supraja Sridhara, Mark Kuhne, Andrin Bertschi, Shweta Shinde |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2024 | ACAI: Protecting Accelerator Execution with Arm Confidential Computing Architecture
Supraja Sridhara, Andrin Bertschi, Benedict Schlüter, Mark Kuhne, Fabio Aliberti, Shweta Shinde |
USENIX Security Symposium | 3 |