Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sohyun An

dblp:348/6996 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Language models and text generation · 46% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Vision and language · 14%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
1.422024
DiffusionNAG: Predictor-guided Neural Architecture Generation with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2024
Meta-prediction Model for Distillation-Aware NAS on Unseen Datasets · ICLR 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
efficient reasoning
0.912025
Don't Think Longer, Think Wisely: Optimizing Thinking Dynamics for Large Reasoning Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.912025
Unlabeled Data Improves Fine-Grained Image Zero-shot Classification with Multimodal LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large reasoning model
0.912025
Don't Think Longer, Think Wisely: Optimizing Thinking Dynamics for Large Reasoning Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Unlabeled Data Improves Fine-Grained Image Zero-shot Classification with Multimodal LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
overthinking
0.912025
Don't Think Longer, Think Wisely: Optimizing Thinking Dynamics for Large Reasoning Models · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
Don't Think Longer, Think Wisely: Optimizing Thinking Dynamics for Large Reasoning Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
prompt learning
0.912025
Unlabeled Data Improves Fine-Grained Image Zero-shot Classification with Multimodal LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification
0.912025
Unlabeled Data Improves Fine-Grained Image Zero-shot Classification with Multimodal LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
automatic prompt generation
0.812024
One Prompt is not Enough: Automated Construction of a Mixture-of-Expert Prompts · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
DiffusionNAG: Predictor-guided Neural Architecture Generation with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.812024
One Prompt is not Enough: Automated Construction of a Mixture-of-Expert Prompts · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
neural architecture generation
0.812024
DiffusionNAG: Predictor-guided Neural Architecture Generation with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering
0.812024
One Prompt is not Enough: Automated Construction of a Mixture-of-Expert Prompts · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.212024
DiffusionNAG: Predictor-guided Neural Architecture Generation with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.212023
Meta-prediction Model for Distillation-Aware NAS on Unseen Datasets · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised prompt learning · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9preference optimization · 0.9iterative refinement · 0.9semantic similarity grouping · 0.8predictor guidance · 0.8kernel regression · 0.8graph diffusion · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8knowledge distillation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Don't Think Longer, Think Wisely: Optimizing Thinking Dynamics for Large Reasoning Models
abstract
While recent success of large reasoning models (LRMs) significantly advanced LLMs' reasoning capability by optimizing the final answer accuracy using reinforcement learning, they may also drastically increase the output length due to *overthinking*—characterized by unnecessarily complex reasoning paths that waste computation and potentially degrade the performance. We hypothesize that such inefficiencies stem from LRMs' limited capability to dynamically select the proper modular reasoning strategies, termed *thinking patterns* at the right position. To investigate this hypothesis, we propose a dynamic optimization framework that segments model-generated reasoning paths into distinct thinking patterns, systematically identifying and promoting beneficial patterns that improve the answer while removing detrimental ones. Empirical analysis confirms that our optimized thinking paths yield more concise yet sufficiently informative trajectories, enhancing reasoning efficiency by reducing attention FLOPs by up to 47% while maintaining accuracy for originally correct responses. Moreover, a non-trivial portion of originally incorrect responses are transformed into correct ones, achieving a 15.6% accuracy improvement with reduced length. Motivated by the improvement brought by the optimized thinking paths, we apply a preference optimization technique supported by a pairwise dataset contrasting suboptimal and optimal reasoning paths. Experimental evaluations across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks reveal that our method notably reduces computational overhead while simultaneously improving reasoning accuracy, achieving up to a 12% accuracy improvement and reducing token usage from approximately 5,000 to 3,000 tokens.
Sohyun An, Tianyi Zhou 0001, Cho-Jui Hsieh
NeurIPS1
2025 Unlabeled Data Improves Fine-Grained Image Zero-shot Classification with Multimodal LLMs
abstract
Despite Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) showing promising results on general zero-shot image classification tasks, fine-grained image classification remains challenging. It demands precise attention to subtle visual details to distinguish between visually similar subcategories—details that MLLMs may easily overlook without explicit guidance. To address this, we introduce AutoSEP, an iterative self-supervised prompt learning framework designed to enhance MLLM fine-grained classification capabilities in a fully unsupervised manner. Our core idea is to leverage unlabeled data to learn a description prompt that guides MLLMs in identifying crucial discriminative features within an image, and boost classification accuracy. We developed an automatic self-enhancing prompt learning framework called AutoSEP to iteratively improve the description prompt using unlabeled data, based on instance-level classification scoring function. AutoSEP only requires black-box access to MLLMs, eliminating the need for any training or fine-tuning. We evaluate our approach on multiple fine-grained classification datasets. It consistently outperforms other unsupervised baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of our self-supervised optimization framework. Notably, AutoSEP in average improves 13\% over standard zero-shot classification and 3\% over the best-performing baselines.
Yunqi Hong, Sohyun An, Andrew Bai, Neil Y. C. Lin, Cho-Jui Hsieh
NeurIPS2
2024 DiffusionNAG: Predictor-guided Neural Architecture Generation with Diffusion Models
abstract
Existing NAS methods suffer from either an excessive amount of time for repetitive sampling and training of many task-irrelevant architectures. To tackle such limitations of existing NAS methods, we propose a paradigm shift from NAS to a novel conditional Neural Architecture Generation (NAG) framework based on diffusion models, dubbed DiffusionNAG. Specifically, we consider the neural architectures as directed graphs and propose a graph diffusion model for generating them. Moreover, with the guidance of parameterized predictors, DiffusionNAG can flexibly generate task-optimal architectures with the desired properties for diverse tasks, by sampling from a region that is more likely to satisfy the properties. This conditional NAG scheme is significantly more efficient than previous NAS schemes which sample the architectures and filter them using the property predictors. We validate the effectiveness of DiffusionNAG through extensive experiments in two predictor-based NAS scenarios: Transferable NAS and Bayesian Optimization (BO)-based NAS. DiffusionNAG achieves superior performance with speedups of up to 35$\times$ when compared to the baselines on Transferable NAS benchmarks. Furthermore, when integrated into a BO-based algorithm, DiffusionNAG outperforms existing BO-based NAS approaches, particularly in the large MobileNetV3 search space on the ImageNet 1K dataset. Code is available at https://github.com/CownowAn/DiffusionNAG.
Sohyun An, Hayeon Lee, Jaehyeong Jo, Seanie Lee, Sung Ju Hwang
ICLR1
2024 One Prompt is not Enough: Automated Construction of a Mixture-of-Expert Prompts
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong generalization capabilities to novel tasks when prompted with language instructions and in-context demos. Since this ability sensitively depends on the quality of prompts, various methods have been explored to automate the instruction design. While these methods demonstrated promising results, they also restricted the searched prompt to one instruction. Such simplification significantly limits their capacity, as a single demo-free instruction might not be able to cover the entire complex problem space of the targeted task. To alleviate this issue, we adopt the Mixture-of-Expert paradigm and divide the problem space into a set of sub-regions; Each sub-region is governed by a specialized expert, equipped with both an instruction and a set of demos. A two-phase process is developed to construct the specialized expert for each region: (1) demo assignment: Inspired by the theoretical connection between in-context learning and kernel regression, we group demos into experts based on their semantic similarity; (2) instruction assignment: A region-based joint search of an instruction per expert complements the demos assigned to it, yielding a synergistic effect. The resulting method, codenamed Mixture-of-Prompts (MoP), achieves an average win rate of 81% against prior arts across several major benchmarks.
Sohyun An, Minhao Cheng, Tianyi Zhou 0001, Sung Ju Hwang, Cho-Jui Hsieh
ICML2
2023 Meta-prediction Model for Distillation-Aware NAS on Unseen Datasets
Hayeon Lee, Sohyun An, Minseon Kim, Sung Ju Hwang
ICLR2