Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haocheng Xia

dblp:349/2976 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8317-6217ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 45% Algorithms and data structures · 30% Mathematical optimization · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Machine learning and data management · 56% Database theory · 39% Distributed and cloud data management · 5%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Network and information security
2 papers
Digital forensics and information hiding · 35% Security and privacy of machine learning · 35% Privacy and data protection · 30%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management
data valuation
2.232025
Computing Shapley Values for Dynamic Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Equitable Data Valuation Meets the Right to Be Forgotten in Model Markets · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Dynamic Shapley Value Computation · ICDE 2023
Database theory
shapley value computation
1.522025
Computing Shapley Values for Dynamic Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Dynamic Shapley Value Computation · ICDE 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.522024
P-Shapley: Shapley Values on Probabilistic Classifiers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Data-faithful Feature Attribution: Mitigating Unobservable Confounders via Instrumental Variables · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
least squares
0.912025
Shapley Value Estimation based on Differential Matrix · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › cooperative game theory › solution concepts
shapley value
0.912025
Shapley Value Estimation based on Differential Matrix · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › cooperative game theory › solution concepts › shapley value
shapley value approximation
0.912025
Shapley Value Estimation based on Differential Matrix · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
data valuation
0.812024
P-Shapley: Shapley Values on Probabilistic Classifiers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution
0.812024
Data-faithful Feature Attribution: Mitigating Unobservable Confounders via Instrumental Variables · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
shapley value
0.812024
P-Shapley: Shapley Values on Probabilistic Classifiers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
model intellectual property protection
0.812024
TabularMark: Watermarking Tabular Datasets for Machine Learning · CCS 2024
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking
0.812024
TabularMark: Watermarking Tabular Datasets for Machine Learning · CCS 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy regulation
right to be forgotten
0.712023
Equitable Data Valuation Meets the Right to Be Forgotten in Model Markets · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic algorithms
0.712023
Dynamic Shapley Value Computation · ICDE 2023
Algorithms and data structures › dynamic algorithms
incremental algorithms
0.712023
Dynamic Shapley Value Computation · ICDE 2023
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.312025
Computing Shapley Values for Dynamic Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
cooperative game theory
0.312025
Shapley Value Estimation based on Differential Matrix · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

delta-based algorithm · 3.7pivot-based algorithm · 3.1shapley value · 2.1heuristic algorithm · 1.7YN-NN algorithm · 1.7sampling-based approximation · 1.3sampling · 1.3stratified sampling · 0.9monte carlo · 0.9least-squares optimization · 0.9watermark embedding · 0.8probability calibration · 0.8machine learning utility preservation · 0.8instrumental variable · 0.8causal inference · 0.8delta-based algorithms · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Efficient Cooperation-Aware Key and Value Management for LLM Inference
Qiheng Sun, Junxu Liu, Haocheng Xia, Jinfei Liu, Kui Ren 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2025 Shapley Value Estimation based on Differential Matrix
abstract
The Shapley value has been extensively used in many fields as the unique metric to fairly evaluate player contributions in cooperative settings. Since the exact computation of Shapley values is \#P-hard in the task-agnostic setting, many studies have been developed to utilize the Monte Carlo method for Shapley value estimation. The existing methods estimate the Shapley values directly. In this paper, we explore a novel idea-inferring the Shapley values by estimating the differences between them. Technically, we estimate a differential matrix consisting of pairwise Shapley value differences to reduce the variance of the estimated Shapley values. We develop a least-squares optimization solution to derive the Shapley values from the differential matrix, minimizing the estimator variances. Additionally, we devise a Monte Carlo method for efficient estimation of the differential matrix and introduce two stratified Monte Carlo methods for further variance reduction. Our experimental results on real and synthetic data sets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the differential-matrix-based sampling approaches.
Junyuan Pang, Jian Pei 0001, Haocheng Xia, Xiang Li 0001, Jinfei Liu
Proc. ACM Manag. Data3
2025 Computing Shapley Values for Dynamic Data
abstract
Data valuation is a core function in data markets and cooperative data sharing.Shapley valueis a widely used approach to fairly measure the contribution of data points towards a collective utility (e.g., a machine learning model trained from the data). However, computing Shapley values is known to be in general #P-hard due to the exponential utility evaluation. Furthermore, the presence of dynamic data poses additional challenges due to the prohibitively expensive cost of recomputing from scratch. In this paper, we study the problem ofDynamic Shapley Value Computation, which focuses on updating Shapley values when dynamically adding or deleting data points. For adding, to prune redundant computation of overlapping model utilities, we propose the pivot-based algorithm that can reduce half the computation time in expectation. We also propose delta-based algorithms to capture Shapley value changes, which require only a smaller sample size to converge. For deleting, we present the YN-NN algorithm that derives the new Shapley values from precomputed utilities efficiently. Based on Shapley value changes, we give another version of the delta-based algorithm for deleting data points. Besides, we propose heuristic algorithms that draw on experimental observations for addition, deletion, and hybrid scenarios. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.
Haocheng Xia, Jiayao Zhang 0006, Qiheng Sun, Jinfei Liu, Kui Ren 0001, Li Xiong 0001, Jian Pei 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2024 TabularMark: Watermarking Tabular Datasets for Machine Learning
abstract
Watermarking is broadly utilized to protect ownership of shared data while preserving data utility. However, existing watermarking methods for tabular datasets fall short on the desired properties (detectability, non-intrusiveness, and robustness) and only preserve data utility from the perspective of data statistics, ignoring the performance of downstream ML models trained on the datasets. Can we watermark tabular datasets without significantly compromising their utility for training ML models while preventing attackers from training usable ML models on attacked datasets?
Yihao Zheng 0001, Haocheng Xia, Junyuan Pang, Jinfei Liu, Kui Ren 0001, Lingyang Chu, Yang Cao 0011, Li Xiong 0001
CCS2
2024 Data-faithful Feature Attribution: Mitigating Unobservable Confounders via Instrumental Variables
abstract
The state-of-the-art feature attribution methods often neglect the influence of unobservable confounders, posing a risk of misinterpretation, especially when it is crucial for the interpretation to remain faithful to the data. To counteract this, we propose a new approach, data-faithful feature attribution, which trains a confounder-free model using instrumental variables. The cluttered effects of unobservable confounders in a model trained as such are decoupled from input features, thereby aligning the output of the model with the contribution of input features to the target feature in the data generation. Furthermore, feature attribution results produced by our method are more robust when focusing on attributions from the perspective of data generation. Our experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches.
Qiheng Sun, Haocheng Xia, Jinfei Liu
NeurIPS2
2024 P-Shapley: Shapley Values on Probabilistic Classifiers
abstract
The Shapley value provides a unique approach to equitably gauge each player's contribution within a coalition and has extensive applications with various utility functions. In data valuation for machine learning, particularly for classification tasks, using classification accuracy as the utility function has become a de facto standard. However, accuracy can be an imprecise metric, potentially missing finer details crucial for valuation. In this paper, we propose the probability-based Shapley (P-Shapley) value, which leverages predicted probabilities to heighten utility differentiation. Several convex calibration functions are further incorporated for probability calibration. We prove that the P-Shapley value outperforms Shapley values based on accuracy or other coarse metrics in approximation stability and the discrimination of marginal utility change can be further improved by convex calibration functions. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches.
Haocheng Xia, Xiang Li 0001, Junyuan Pang, Jinfei Liu, Kui Ren 0001, Li Xiong 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2023 Dynamic Shapley Value Computation
abstract
With the prevalence of data-driven research, data valuation has attracted attention from the computer science field. How to appraise a single datum becomes an imperative problem, especially in the context of machine learning. Shapley value is widely used to fairly measure the contribution of data points in machine learning since it is the unique definition that satisfies all four desired properties: balance, symmetry, additivity, and zero element. However, computing Shapley value is known to be a #P-hard problem. As data is subject to changes, dynamic data exists pervasively in real-world scenarios. Pricing such dynamic data is more challenging due to the prohibitively expensive cost of recalculation from scratch. In this paper, we study the problem of Dynamic Shapley Value Computation, which updates Shapley value when dynamically adding/deleting data points. For adding data points, to prune unnecessary computation of overlapping model utilities, we propose the pivot-based algorithm that can reduce half computation time in general. We also propose the delta-based algorithm to capture Shapley value changes, which requires a smaller sample size to converge. For deleting data points, we present the YN-NN algorithm that derives the new Shapley value from the data structure of precomputed model utilities in an efficient way. Based on Shapley value changes, we give another version of the delta-based algorithm for deleting data points. Besides, we propose heuristic algorithms to draw on experimental observations for both adding and deleting data points. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.
Jiayao Zhang 0006, Haocheng Xia, Qiheng Sun, Jinfei Liu, Li Xiong 0001, Jian Pei 0001, Kui Ren 0001
ICDE2
2023 Equitable Data Valuation Meets the Right to Be Forgotten in Model Markets
abstract
The increasing demand for data-driven machine learning (ML) models has led to the emergence of model markets, where a broker collects personal data from data owners to produce high-usability ML models. To incentivize data owners to share their data, the broker needs to price data appropriately while protecting their privacy. Forequitable data valuation, which is crucial in data pricing,Shapley valuehas become the most prevalent technique because it satisfies all four desirable properties in fairness: balance, symmetry, zero element, and additivity. Forthe right to be forgotten, which is stipulated by many data privacy protection laws to allow data owners to unlearn their data from trained models, thesharded structurein ML model training has become a de facto standard to reduce the cost of future unlearning by avoiding retraining the entire model from scratch. In this paper, we explore how the sharded structure for the right to be forgotten affects Shapley value for equitable data valuation in model markets. To adapt Shapley value for the sharded structure, we propose S-Shapley value, a sharded structure-based Shapley value, which satisfies four desirable properties for data valuation. Since we prove that computing S-Shapley value is #P-complete, two sampling-based methods are developed to approximate S-Shapley value. Furthermore, to efficiently update valuation results after data owners unlearn their data, we present two delta-based algorithms that estimate the change of data value instead of the data value itself. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.
Haocheng Xia, Jinfei Liu, Jian Lou 0001, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren 0001, Yang Cao 0011, Li Xiong 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.1