Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abigail Wezelis

dblp:349/5142 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0007-3849-9061ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 53% Embedded and real-time systems · 16% Energy-efficient computing · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
coarse-grained reconfigurable architecture
0.712023
Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023
Energy-efficient computing
energy-constrained computing
0.212023
Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023
Embedded and real-time systems
energy-efficient embedded systems
0.212023
Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023
Memory systems
memory architecture
0.212023
Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload characterization · 0.7architectural simulation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Programmable Olfactory Computing
abstract
While smell is arguably the most visceral of senses, olfactory computing has been barely explored in the mainstream. We argue that this is a good time to explore olfactory computing since a) a large number of driver applications are emerging, b) odor sensors are now dramatically better, and c) non-traditional form factors such as sensor, wearable, and xR devices that would be required to support olfactory computing are already getting widespread acceptance. Through a comprehensive review of literature, we identify the key algorithms needed to support a wide variety of olfactory computing tasks. We profiled these algorithms on existing hardware and identified several characteristics, including the preponderance of fixed-point computation, and linear operations, and real arithmetic; a variety of data memory requirements; and opportunities for data-level parallelism. We propose Ahromaa, a heterogeneous architecture for olfactory computing targeting extremely power and energy constrained olfactory computing workloads and evaluate it against baseline architectures of an MCU, a state-of-art CGRA, and an MCU with packed SIMD. Across our algorithms, Ahromaa's operating modes outperform the baseline architectures by 1.36, 1.22, and 1.1× in energy efficiency when operating at MEOP. We also show how careful design of data memory organization can lead to significant energy savings in olfactory computing, due to the limited amount of data memory many olfactory computing kernels require. These improvements to the data memory organization lead to additional 4.21, 4.37, and 2.85× improvements in energy efficiency on average.
Nathaniel Bleier, Abigail Wezelis, Lav R. Varshney, Rakesh Kumar 0002
ISCA2