Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abigail Wezelis
dblp:349/5142
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0007-3849-9061ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 53% Embedded and real-time systems · 16% Energy-efficient computing · 16% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
coarse-grained reconfigurable architecture |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023 |
Energy-efficient computing
energy-constrained computing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023 |
Embedded and real-time systems
energy-efficient embedded systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023 |
Memory systems
memory architecture |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Programmable Olfactory Computing · ISCA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workload characterization · 0.7architectural simulation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Programmable Olfactory ComputingabstractWhile smell is arguably the most visceral of senses, olfactory computing has been barely explored in the mainstream. We argue that this is a good time to explore olfactory computing since a) a large number of driver applications are emerging, b) odor sensors are now dramatically better, and c) non-traditional form factors such as sensor, wearable, and xR devices that would be required to support olfactory computing are already getting widespread acceptance. Through a comprehensive review of literature, we identify the key algorithms needed to support a wide variety of olfactory computing tasks. We profiled these algorithms on existing hardware and identified several characteristics, including the preponderance of fixed-point computation, and linear operations, and real arithmetic; a variety of data memory requirements; and opportunities for data-level parallelism. We propose Ahromaa, a heterogeneous architecture for olfactory computing targeting extremely power and energy constrained olfactory computing workloads and evaluate it against baseline architectures of an MCU, a state-of-art CGRA, and an MCU with packed SIMD. Across our algorithms, Ahromaa's operating modes outperform the baseline architectures by 1.36, 1.22, and 1.1× in energy efficiency when operating at MEOP. We also show how careful design of data memory organization can lead to significant energy savings in olfactory computing, due to the limited amount of data memory many olfactory computing kernels require. These improvements to the data memory organization lead to additional 4.21, 4.37, and 2.85× improvements in energy efficiency on average. Nathaniel Bleier, Abigail Wezelis, Lav R. Varshney, Rakesh Kumar 0002 |
ISCA | 2 |