Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tony Burgess
dblp:35/10676
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5526-6004ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 50% Usability and user experience research · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods › user-centered design
persona development |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Comparing Semi-Automated Clustering Methods for Persona Development · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2012 |
Usability and user experience research
user modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Comparing Semi-Automated Clustering Methods for Persona Development · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
principal component analysis · 0.1latent semantic analysis · 0.1factor analysis · 0.1cluster analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Calming the Mind: Spiking Neural Networks Reveal How Havening Touch to Reduce Persistent Distress Attenuates Left Temporal Electroencephalographic Connectivity
Alexander Sumich, Zohreh Gholami Doborjeh, Nadja Heym, Aroha Scott, Kirsty Hunter, Tony Burgess, Julie French, Mustafa Sarkar, Maryam Doborjeh, Nikola K. Kasabov |
ICONIP (11) | 6 |
| 2012 | Comparing Semi-Automated Clustering Methods for Persona DevelopmentabstractCurrent and future information systems require a better understanding of the interactions between users and systems in order to improve system use and, ultimately, success. The use of personas as design tools is becoming more widespread as researchers and practitioners discover its benefits. This paper presents an empirical study comparing the performance of existing qualitative and quantitative clustering techniques for the task of identifying personas and grouping system users into those personas. A method based on Factor (Principal Components) Analysis performs better than two other methods which use Latent Semantic Analysis and Cluster Analysis as measured by similarity to expert manually defined clusters. Jonalan Brickey, Steven Walczak, Tony Burgess |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |