Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gyudong Jeon

dblp:35/3144 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot manipulation · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › interaction control
contact transition control
0.012000
Pre-Transition Phase Control: Three Different Approaches · ICRA 2000
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.012000
Pre-Transition Phase Control: Three Different Approaches · ICRA 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

suppression controller · 0.0joint damping controller · 0.0flexible-damped joint · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Pre-Transition Phase Control: Three Different Approaches
abstract
In this paper, we consider hard contact transition such as hammering when the manipulator's approaching velocity is high or the environment is very stiff. In contact transition, phase transition can be divided into two definitely different phases, "pre-transition phase" and "transition phase". Here we define the "pre-transition phase" and we propose three control methods. First, we propose a novel controller named as "suppression controller" which is not only stable but also simple to implement. Second, we present passive damper named as "flexible-damped joint" which is a good solution to circumvent the pre-transition phase. Third, we suggest a stable and simple controller which can maximize joint damping and minimize recontact velocity in the flexible-damped joint. It is named as "joint damping controller". The effectiveness of these three approaches are verified via experiments using the POSTECH 1-DOF DD arm.
Nakju Lett Doh, Gyudong Jeon, Wan Kyun Chung, Youngil Youm
ICRA2