Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Davy Marchand-Maillet

dblp:35/5131 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
plenoptic function
0.112012
On the Bandwidth of the Plenoptic Function · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multidimensional signal processing · 0.1band-limited signal analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 On the Bandwidth of the Plenoptic Function
abstract
The plenoptic function (POF) provides a powerful conceptual tool for describing a number of problems in image/video processing, vision, and graphics. For example, image-based rendering is shown as sampling and interpolation of the POF. In such applications, it is important to characterize the bandwidth of the POF. We study a simple but representative model of the scene where band-limited signals (e.g., texture images) are "painted" on smooth surfaces (e.g., of objects or walls). We show that, in general, the POF is not band limited unless the surfaces are flat. We then derive simple rules to estimate the essential bandwidth of the POF for this model. Our analysis reveals that, in addition to the maximum and minimum depths and the maximum frequency of painted signals, the bandwidth of the POF also depends on the maximum surface slope. With a unifying formalism based on multidimensional signal processing, we can verify several key results in POF processing, such as induced filtering in space and depth-corrected interpolation, and quantify the necessary sampling rates.
Minh N. Do, Davy Marchand-Maillet, Martin Vetterli
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
2005 On the bandlimitedness of the plenoptic function
abstract
Image based-rendering (IBR) can be seen as the sampling and reconstruction of the plenoptic function. The question of the minimum sampling rate in IBR can be addressed via spectral analysis of the plenoptic function. We study a model of the scene where bandlimited images are "painted" on surfaces (e.g. of objects or walls). We show that, in general, the plenoptic function is not bandlimited unless the surfaces are flat. We then characterize the spectral decay of the plenoptic function for this model.
Minh N. Do, Davy Marchand-Maillet, Martin Vetterli
ICIP (3)2