Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Tolliver
dblp:35/5438
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Graph Partitioning by Spectral Rounding: Applications in Image Segmentation and Clustering · CVPR (1) 2006 Corrected Laplacians: Closer Cuts and Segmentation with Shape Priors · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
computational genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Robust unmixing of tumor states in array comparative genomic hybridization data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor evolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Robust unmixing of tumor states in array comparative genomic hybridization data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Graph Partitioning by Spectral Rounding: Applications in Image Segmentation and Clustering · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › graph-based segmentation
spectral graph segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Graph Partitioning by Spectral Rounding: Applications in Image Segmentation and Clustering · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
spectral clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Graph Partitioning by Spectral Rounding: Applications in Image Segmentation and Clustering · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Corrected Laplacians: Closer Cuts and Segmentation with Shape Priors · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › model-based segmentation
shape-prior segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Corrected Laplacians: Closer Cuts and Segmentation with Shape Priors · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral rounding · 0.1normalized cut · 0.1eigenvector computation · 0.1gradient optimization · 0.1geometric unmixing · 0.1statistical shape model · 0.1corrected laplacian optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Combinatorial preconditioners and multilevel solvers for problems in computer vision and image processing
Ioannis Koutis, Gary L. Miller, David Tolliver |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 3 |
| 2010 | Robust unmixing of tumor states in array comparative genomic hybridization dataabstractMOTIVATION: Tumorigenesis is an evolutionary process by which tumor cells acquire sequences of mutations leading to increased growth, invasiveness and eventually metastasis. It is hoped that by identifying the common patterns of mutations underlying major cancer sub-types, we can better understand the molecular basis of tumor development and identify new diagnostics and therapeutic targets. This goal has motivated several attempts to apply evolutionary tree reconstruction methods to assays of tumor state. Inference of tumor evolution is in principle aided by the fact that tumors are heterogeneous, retaining remnant populations of different stages along their development along with contaminating healthy cell populations. In practice, though, this heterogeneity complicates interpretation of tumor data because distinct cell types are conflated by common methods for assaying the tumor state. We previously proposed a method to computationally infer cell populations from measures of tumor-wide gene expression through a geometric interpretation of mixture type separation, but this approach deals poorly with noisy and outlier data. RESULTS: In the present work, we propose a new method to perform tumor mixture separation efficiently and robustly to an experimental error. The method builds on the prior geometric approach but uses a novel objective function allowing for robust fits that greatly reduces the sensitivity to noise and outliers. We further develop an efficient gradient optimization method to optimize this 'soft geometric unmixing' objective for measurements of tumor DNA copy numbers assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) data. We show, on a combination of semi-synthetic and real data, that the method yields fast and accurate separation of tumor states. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown a novel objective function and optimization method for the robust separation of tumor sub-types from aCGH data and have shown that the method provides fast, accurate reconstruction of tumor states from mixed samples. Better solutions to this problem can be expected to improve our ability to accurately identify genetic abnormalities in primary tumor samples and to infer patterns of tumor evolution. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. David Tolliver, Charalampos E. Tsourakakis, Ayshwarya Subramanian, Stanley Shackney, Russell Schwartz |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2006 | Graph Partitioning by Spectral Rounding: Applications in Image Segmentation and ClusteringabstractWe introduce a family of spectral partitioning methods. Edge separators of a graph are produced by iteratively reweighting the edges until the graph disconnects into the prescribed number of components. At each iteration a small number of eigenvectors with small eigenvalue are computed and used to determine the reweighting. In this way spectral rounding directly produces discrete solutions where as current spectral algorithms must map the continuous eigenvectors to discrete solutions by employing a heuristic geometric separator (e.g. k-means). We show that spectral rounding compares favorably to current spectral approximations on the Normalized Cut criterion (NCut). Results are given for natural image segmentation, medical image segmentation, and clustering. A practical version is shown to converge. David Tolliver, Gary L. Miller |
CVPR (1) | 1 |
| 2005 | Corrected Laplacians: Closer Cuts and Segmentation with Shape PriorsabstractWe optimize over the set of corrected Laplacians (CL) associated with a weighted graph to improve the average case normalized cut (NCut) of a graph. Unlike edge-relaxation SDPs, optimizing over the set CL naturally exploits the matrix sparsity by operating solely on the diagonal. This structure is critical to image segmentation applications because the number of vertices is generally proportional to the number of pixels in the image. CL optimization provides a guiding principle for improving the combinatorial solution over the spectral relaxation, which is important because small improvements in the cut cost often result in significant improvements in the perceptual relevance of the segmentation. We develop an optimization procedure to accommodate prior information in the form of statistical shape models, resulting in a segmentation method that produces foreground regions which are consistent with a parameterized family of shapes. We validate our technique with ground truth on MRI medical images, providing a quantitative comparison against results produced by current spectral relaxation approaches to graph partitioning. David Tolliver, Gary L. Miller, Robert T. Collins |
CVPR (2) | 1 |